The Daily Telegraph

An Orpheus that fails to enchant or surprise

- Rupert Christians­en CHIEF OPERA CRITIC

Orpheus

Sam Wanamaker Playhouse, Globe

Background reading made this sound as though it should be so interestin­g and charming that I am positively shocked at myself for finding it purgatoria­lly tedious in performanc­e. No reflection on the excellent musicians or the adequate production (presented in collaborat­ion with the Royal Opera) – it’s just that neither the music nor the drama offered me anything viscerally engaging. The historical significan­ce of

Orpheus (or Orfeo, as it was originally known) is doubtless considerab­le. First performed at the Palais Royal in Paris in 1647, it ranks as the first opera composed in France, albeit written by foreigners: Luigi Rossi (music) and Francesco Buti (poet) had been imported from Rome by top banana Cardinal Mazarin, who decided that the court of Louis XIV needed an injection of Italian cultural glamour.

The first performanc­e was a mighty spectacula­r affair, combining elements of native masque – formal dances, magical stage effects, sumptuous décor – with the new style of aria and recitative. Its success would sow the seeds for the growth of a distinctiv­ely French style of opera, tragédie lyrique, perfected later by Lully and Rameau.

All this is fascinatin­g on paper, but it does not make Orpheus a living artistic experience nearly four centuries later. Rossi and Buti emerge only as baroque hacks, cookie-cutting out of the clichés of Venetian opera, and neither the unadventur­ous vocal lines nor the small string orchestra and continuo yield a memorable or moving episode.

The plot follows the familiar outline, fleshed out with the insertion of a rival for Eurydice’s hand and some tiresome secondary comic characters. Along the way, there are some pleasant interludes – an elegant trio for Three Graces, for example, or Eurydice’s dying lament – and Rossi and Buti clearly knew exactly what formula to follow in a Broadway musical fashion.

But think of the magnificen­ce, intensity and concision of Monteverdi’s Orfeo, written a generation previously, and this version seems hopelessly pallid and prolix in comparison, with Orpheus himself a cipher and the choral element banal.

Perhaps it could all seem more vivid in a larger space than that provided by the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse, a candle-lit replica of a Jacobean indoor theatre that is probably a third of the size of the splendid salle at the Palais Royal. Here, everything is cramped, the wooden acoustic unresonant and the stage only capable of delivering rather prosaic special effects.

The director, Keith Warner, has done his level best, clothing the cast in handsome Caroline garb and keeping everyone moving briskly and brightly, but nothing enchants or surprises. In the gallery, Christian Curnyn conducted musicians of his Early Opera Company from the harpsichor­d: they are very accomplish­ed.

Victim of a throat infection, Mary Bevan gallantly mimed the title role (written for a soprano castrato), while at short notice Siobhan Stagg sang her music prettily above the stage. Louise Alder is a winning Eurydice, and Graeme Broadbent, Mark Milhofer and Philip Smith camp it up as the comic and grotesque villains and lechers.

But the most distinguis­hed performanc­e came from the Australian mezzo-soprano Caitlin Hulcup as Orpheus’s rival, Aristaeus (another castrato role): his/her mad scene after Eurydice’s death brought an otherwise absent note of emotional urgency to the proceeding­s and momentaril­y made me feel that the opera had something sincere to communicat­e. Until Nov 8. Tickets: 020 7304 4000; roh.org.uk

 ??  ?? Orpheus (Keri Fuge as Cupid and Sky Ingram as Venus, above) was fascinatin­g on paper, but less memorable in performanc­e
Orpheus (Keri Fuge as Cupid and Sky Ingram as Venus, above) was fascinatin­g on paper, but less memorable in performanc­e
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom