The Daily Telegraph

EU still losing hundreds of millions each year to fraud

Watchdog names and shames Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary as false claims reach €670m

- By Matthew Holehouse in Brussels

MORE than £670 million of EU spending was lost to fraud last year, new figures show.

But officials implicated in misappropr­iated funds are being allowed to keep their jobs.

The false claims were concentrat­ed in Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) said. It is a slight decline from €901 million (£691 million) last year, but is still a major jump from €284 million (£217 million) in 2012.

Examples of fraud included €1.3 million of EU agricultur­al aid to modernise a vegetable chilling plant in Bulgaria. Investigat­ors found the equipment supplier and the factory owner were the same Italian citizen, who had “substantia­lly inflated” the price of the machinery.

In another case, €2 million of aid was sent to an ecology project in Africa the operators of which were billing different internatio­nal donors for the same work by supplying “systematic­ally false informatio­n”.

In another case, an official involving in awarding European Investment Bank funds to a Romanian health project rigged the bidding process in exchange for a kickback of five per cent from contractor­s.

The figures also show that around €900,000 was lost in 2015 to dishonest EU staff. However, four in 10 EU officials found to have been implicated in wrongdoing were not punished and only a handful were dismissed, the report revealed.

Between January 2013 and December 2015, 58 “disciplina­ry recommenda­tions” were issued to bodies such as the European Council, the Court of Justice and the European Commission.

Of these, just 18 resulted in “action taken” while in 14 cases it was ruled that “no case is made”. Another 26 cases are pending.

Of those punished, in six cases people were fired, while two were demoted. Twelve written warnings were issued.

Officials denied that the institutio­ns are turning a blind eye to wrongdoing, saying many of the dropped cases related to people whose contracts ex- pired before they were punished. The figures also show that national prosecutor­s are failing to crackdown on EU fraud. Out of 317 cases sent to prosecutor­s, 148 resulted in indictment­s – a rate of 47 per cent.

“We do sense that the national prosecutor­s do not prioritise cases where there is a damage to EU interest at the same level as national interests,” said Petra Kneuer, the director of investigat­ions.

Giovanni Kessler, the head of the agency, said he did not believe there was widespread corruption, however, and that a sharp increase in fraud detected after 2013 showed his agency was making its mark in encouragin­g people to report concerns.

Mr Kessler backs the creation of a prosecutor­s’ office for the EU which could have greater powers than OLAF to investigat­e. Government­s have resisted that idea, however.

A spokesman for the European Commission said: “We have zero tolerance for fraud against the EU budget. OLAF’s work is part and parcel of the efforts to uncover and prevent fraud in the mem- ber states and to get money returned to the taxpayers.

“The EU budget is primarily spent by the authoritie­s in the member states.

“Let us, therefore, be clear: it is primarily the member states’ responsibi­lity to ensure that the EU budget is spent flawlessly in their territorie­s.

“Consequent­ly, the Commission is working – and will continue working – with member states to help them address the recommenda­tion of OLAF to have the money recovered to the EU budget.”

Mr Kessler is locked in a personal legal battle with the EU authoritie­s after the European Commission lifted his immunity from prosecutio­n.

He faces two years in prison under Belgian law, over allegation­s that he breached wiretappin­g rules by listening to a recorded telephone conversati­on.

It was part of an investigat­ion into the influence of the tobacco lobby on John Dalli, the health commission­er who resigned over allegation­s of impropriet­y.

Mr Kessler said it was the “wrong decision” to strip his immunity and said it would harm the work of the anti-fraud watchdog.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom