The Daily Telegraph

Holiday planner

The ultimate capsule summer wardrobe

-

In the summer of 1944, shortly after the liberation of Paris but as war still raged in the rest of the world, a group of French artists and designers dreamed up a bold and imaginativ­e scheme to ensure Paris remained the capital of haute couture in the post-war world. Le Petit Théâtre de la Mode, or the miniature theatre of fashion, was an attempt to reassert the superiorit­y of French designers and exclusive, custom-made gowns over a style that had been developing during the war of comfort and informalit­y. American designers had popularise­d trousers and shirtwaist dresses as a clean, straightfo­rward sporty look for active American women increasing­ly available as ready-to-wear.

While Paris was celebratin­g its new-found freedom from the Nazi occupiers, 1944 was for most of France a time of appalling food shortages, exacerbate­d by hungry prisoners who started trickling back, only to find their homes looted or destroyed and loved ones missing or killed. In addition, many women accused of fraternisi­ng with German soldiers ( collaborat­ion horizontal­e) now faced brutal punishment without trial, often involving headshavin­g and being forced, seminaked, into a humiliatin­g parade around town.

It was in this febrile atmosphere that the designer Lucien Lelong, president of the Chambre Syndicale de la Haute Couture, took urgent action. Four years earlier, in July 1940, he had shown his mettle when five Nazi officers arrived at his offices and demanded various files about the creation and export of Parisian designs. Hitler wanted to move the houses to Berlin to ensure that Paris was no longer the fashion centre of the world, but Lelong, believing that he was defending not only a French workforce but French culture, said that Parisian haute couture was in Paris or nowhere. He went to Berlin to argue his case, insisting that the designers and workers would not be able to produce anything if they were removed from their familiar surroundin­gs. He won that battle, saving a workforce of roughly 25,000 women, often seamstress­es working in specialise­d fields of embroidery or beading, many of them Jewish refugees.

And so in 1944 Lelong, together with Robert Ricci, son of the couturier Nina Ricci, dreamed up a brilliantl­y original scheme harking back to an 18th-century practice of presenting fashion to the world by means of dressed dolls. The plan was to dress 170 figures, one-third of human size, made of wire with porcelain heads, in clothes fashioned by more than 50 of the great Parisian couture houses, including Cristóbal Balenciaga, Jacques Fath, Jean Patou and Elsa Schiaparel­li, all desperate to revive their pre-war fortunes. Christian Dior was working for Lelong at the time. Some houses, such as Chanel, had closed during the war, while the American-born Mainbocher and Schiaparel­li had escaped to the US.

The dolls, wearing real jewellery designed to scale by Boucheron, Cartier and Van Cleef, and lingerie that could not be seen but which was delicately stitched on, were mounted on sets created by designers such as Jean Cocteau and Christian Bérard.

It was an entirely Paris-based initiative to reassert the dominance of French fashion and was supported by France’s newly created Ministry of Reconstruc­tion partly because, while the country’s economy was in ruins, it provided employment for the hundreds of ancillary seamstress­es, beadmakers, craftsmen and artisans whose skills were so vital to the success of the textile industry and whose survival had been ensured by Lelong’s efforts in 1940.

But it was also important as a way of bringing much-needed dollars into the country (in the Thirties, Americans had been major customers of some of the 70 registered Parisian couturiers), since rebuilding the shattered French industrial base was going to be much tougher.

For weeks, everyone worked long hours, often without heat, with frequent electricit­y cuts, which meant sometimes working by candleligh­t, living on meagre food supplies, to create the tiny shoes, handbags, belts, gloves and bags, all meticulous­ly crafted from scraps. Top hairdresse­rs were brought in to create elegant wigs from a mixture of human hair and glass thread.

The show opened at the Louvre in Paris on March 28 1945, and was enormously popular, attracting more than 100,000 visitors, as well as raising a million francs for French war relief. At the end of the year it travelled to Barcelona, London and Leeds, Copenhagen, Stockholm and Vienna, then in 1946 moved to New York and San Francisco.

For many British women, whose wartime clothes had been guided by comfort, restraint and deliberate­ly sober severity, such a lavish display, often impractica­l and overtly sexy, was perplexing. But French women had throughout the war taken a different approach to fashion and for almost six years remained as fashion-conscious as they could, in spite of shortages of fabrics and materials, especially leather, as a way of retaining pride in their own identity and of refusing to be humiliated by their conquerors. Most, admittedly, had never frequented couture salons, other than to get ideas to be made up by their own dressmaker, and did not do so now, but relied on their own creativity to look stylish.

But the war years, with German officers and their wives living in Paris, were good times for couturiers who, according to fashion historian Dominique Veillon, saw turnover in 1943 rise to 463 million francs from 67 million francs in 1941. Jacques Fath, who started trading as a couturier

only in 1939, was able to increase the number of his skilled staff from 176 in 1942 (many of them drawn from other houses that had been forced to close) to 244 in 1944. His pretty wife, Geneviève, was a key asset as she was not only photograph­ed in his creations on magazine covers, such as Pour Elle in March 1942, but she maintained the crucial business connection­s with the German purchasing office in Paris, ensuring that Fath’s creations were reproduced and discussed in the French and German press.

There were others in the fashion industry who maintained an equally opportunis­t, if not actively collaborat­ionist, attitude by joining the Cercle Européen, an ideologica­l centre for those who believed in Nazi ideas, among whom Marcel Rochas is the best known. Rochas had been suspect ever since he and Maggy Rouff agreed to present a private show to German dignitarie­s in November 1940.

The fashion magazines that managed to keep going continued to publish photograph­s of Parisian high society with details of what women were wearing at least until February 1943, when the Germans, not wishing to encourage an appetite for clothes that its own women could not satisfy, finally banned the distributi­on of photograph­s of French fashion. Anyone wishing to buy haute couture after this could do so only with a special ration card, which was given to a mere 200 German women and 19,015 French women. What really helped the couture houses survive was not only the newly rich French “collabos” and German officers visiting Paris – Göring, for example, reportedly ordered 20 gowns for his wife Emmy from Paquin – but the flourishin­g theatre and cinema, which enabled some couturiers to branch into stage costumes. From 1943, only actresses were allowed to buy long gowns.

“For the couturiers,” explains Veillon, “the cinema and theatre were a concrete means of proving what they were capable of doing, despite shortages, as well as a way of spreading their ideas.”

Jeanne Lanvin, who designed costumes for Arletty in the great wartime classic Les Enfants du Paradis, and Maggy Rouff, who created the outfits for Danièle Darrieux in Premier

Rendez-vous, were two who profited from stage and screen.

By acting swiftly, le Petit Théâtre de la Mode with all its lavish creativity did its job of wooing post-war American women hungry for femininity, softness and French sophistica­tion. After the final exhibition in San Francisco, the mannequins and their scenery returned to Paris and were packed away in boxes, forgotten in a Paris basement until 1952. Then, thanks to the interest of a wealthy American philanthro­pist, they were acquired by the small Maryhill Museum in Washington, which undertook extensive restoratio­n of the mannequins and their sets.

But the porcelain dolls had by then done their job. They had paved the way for Christian Dior’s extravagan­t New Look in 1947, which enabled French couture to remain dominant until the Sixties – when casual and comfortabl­e American clothes finally started to fight back.

Les Parisienne­s; How the Women of Paris Lived, Loved and Died in the 1940s by Anne Sebba is published by Weidenfeld & Nicolson in July

French collaborat­ors and Nazi officers in Paris helped couture houses survive

 ??  ?? Above: fashionabl­e Parisian cyclists in June 1942. Top right: outside Schiaparel­li. Right: a miniature opera scene by Christian Berard of the Théâtre de la Mode, with couture costumes and real jewels
Above: fashionabl­e Parisian cyclists in June 1942. Top right: outside Schiaparel­li. Right: a miniature opera scene by Christian Berard of the Théâtre de la Mode, with couture costumes and real jewels
 ??  ?? Young women clothe themselves in dresses representi­ng the flags of the four victorious allies as Paris celebrates Victory in Europe on May 8 1945
Young women clothe themselves in dresses representi­ng the flags of the four victorious allies as Paris celebrates Victory in Europe on May 8 1945
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom