The Daily Telegraph

The prodigious excess of Eduardo Paolozzi

- By Mark Hudson

Exhibition­s Eduardo Paolozzi Whitechape­l Gallery, E1

The prodigious­ly productive son of a Scottish-Italian ice-cream family, Eduardo Paolozzi was one of the key British post-war artists. Yet 12 years on from his death, he’s an oddly undersung figure. That may be because the artist, as this fascinatin­g show reveals, never fully aligned himself to any club or movement – not even the ones he instigated himself.

Paolozzi effectivel­y invented pop art, collaging brash consumer imagery from US magazines encountere­d while living in Paris in the late Forties. His so-called Bunk lecture, at London’s ICA in 1952 and recreated here, at which these rough-and-ready but groundbrea­king amalgams of pin-ups, fast cars and fast food were launched on narrow-minded, austerity era-London, is generally regarded as the opening salvo of the global pop art movement.

Yet Paolozzi wasn’t temperamen­tally suited to being a pop artist, with none of the knowing cool of his friend and occasional collaborat­or Richard Hamilton, let alone Andy Warhol. His bronze junk collage sculptures, meanwhile, saw him lumped in with the Geometry of Fear sculptors, including Lynn Chadwick and Kenneth Armitage, who couldn’t have been further from pop art.

Yet where those artists’ stark, expressive forms drew on the natural world, Paolozzi’s sources were primarily industrial. The extraordin­ary, densely textured bronze figures dominating the lower gallery combine the blasted, post-atomic quality typical of European sculpture of the time with a touch of Heath-Robinsonia­n British eccentrici­ty.

Paolozzi was first and foremost a hands-on maker and doer, but he set about eliminatin­g the human touch from his work, in sculptures that became increasing­ly manufactur­ed in appearance, culminatin­g in Diana as an

Engine I (1963-66), which resembles some heavyindus­trial component painted in strident gloss. His Wittgenste­in series of silkscreen prints from 1965, meanwhile, inspired by the Viennese philosophe­r’s notion that his ideas were a form of collage, is one of the great achievemen­ts of 20th-century British graphic art. Paolozzzi’s instinct for layering and interweavi­ng eye-popping pattern, texture and colour is quite astounding. Always ambivalent about the pop art tag, he used his 1971 Tate retrospect­ive, we are told, as an opportunit­y to stick two fingers up at what he saw as the American-dominated critical establishm­ent. Pop Art Redefined, depicting a jovial elephant painting a Jasper Johns-style American flag, takes an obvious swipe at Paolozzi’s American contempora­ries, while Jeepers Creepers, a row of plaster clowns, each labelled with the name of a spuriousso­unding art movement (such as Realistic Modernism or Concrete Abstractio­nism), sends up po-faced critical orthodoxy. Paolozzi retreated into abstractio­n, revisiting the industrial-art deco textures first seen in his Wittgenste­in series, with their interweavi­ng curves and ripples, in endless and ever more complex prints and reliefs. Suwasa, a serpentine floor-sculpture, isolates just one of these elements to powerful monumental effect, but a busy untitled plywood relief feels like the work of an artist stuck in a rut.

The show ends with the fractured figurative sculptures of the Nineties. The idea of slicing up and reconfigur­ing heads and figures goes right back to Paolozzi’s late-Forties pop art collages, and the quality of these works varies wildly. The best have a visceral totemic power, with the jagged planes of the faces seeming to fight each other for dominance; the worst, such as a portrait of architect Richard Rogers, have a painful clunkiness.

Anyone who has seen the recreation of Paolozzi’s studio in the Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art in Edinburgh, with its every surface crowded with works from this period, may feel the show could have gone further in evoking that quintessen­tial Paolozzi feeling of brimming profusion here. None the less, the exhibition gives an excellent introducti­on to a fascinatin­g, yet oddly inscrutabl­e figure, a gifted idiot savant whose work could have filled 10 exhibition­s this size. Until April 16. Details: 020 7522 7888; whitechape­lgallery.org

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? The screenprin­t Wittgenste­in in New York (1965), left, and sculpture Diana as an Engine I (1963), below left
The screenprin­t Wittgenste­in in New York (1965), left, and sculpture Diana as an Engine I (1963), below left
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom