The Daily Telegraph

Paralympic athletes may be cheats – that’s good

This new sporting row might, at last, show that disabled people have the same traits as everyone else

- LEAH HARDY

There’s a scandal brewing in the Paralympic world. Competitor­s and the disgruntle­d father of a competitor have claimed that cheating is harming the sport. More specifical­ly, it’s alleged that some athletes have gamed the arcane but necessary classifica­tion system that ensures, as far as possible, fairness for athletes with wildly varying disabiliti­es.

The reports, while unproven, have been taken so seriously that the Internatio­nal Paralympic Committee (IPC) has provided written evidence to a Parliament­ary hearing looking into classifica­tion. Our most decorated wheelchair athlete, Tanni Grey-thompson, has been called as a witness.

But should we be shocked that disabled athletes and their coaches might be just as competitiv­e, determined, and yes, sometimes as dishonest, as their non-disabled counterpar­ts? That, in fact, they may not all be sweet, inspiratio­nal, and saintly figures? There have even been calls for the investigat­ion itself to be shut down in case it upsets disabled athletes, as if all those medals had been won for therapeuti­c basketweav­ing instead of for blood and sweat. What nonsense.

Of course, disability sport, including the Paralympic­s and Prince Harry’s Invictus Games, has been a powerful force for good. However, the idea that disabled people are too “nice”, or perhaps even too inept, to cheat, or that they should be protected even from any discussion of cheating, reveals a darker side to the disabled athletes’ national treasure status.

This is that disabled people generally are all too often regarded with a grisly, cloying sentimenta­lity.

In fact, if there’s one thing people like me – parents of a child with a disability – are used to, it’s the head tilt. It comes when you mention your child’s disability for the first time, and is normally accompanie­d by a moue of concern, tragically knitted brows and a saccharine: “Oh, I’m so sorry.” Then come the ghastly stock phrases. “But they are so cheerful!” or “It takes a special parent to raise a special child”. The words “brave” and “sweet” may also appear.

People with disabiliti­es face many barriers to full equality. Things that would help include physical access to buildings, an understand­ing of how they may communicat­e differentl­y, help with the £550-a-month extra cost of disability, adaptation­s at work and home so they can live independen­tly, and zero tolerance of bullying and hate crimes. Lack of these contribute to the sorry statistic that disabled people are more than twice as likely to be unemployed as non-disabled people.

What doesn’t help is sentimenta­lity. My teenage son is still offered kids’ stickers at the dentist, which he finds deeply insulting. The sing-song voice used by many health profession­als drives him mad.

Patronisin­g attitudes can go hand in hand with discrimina­tion. Low expectatio­ns harm school performanc­e. Who wants to employ, befriend or date a childlike paragon? How can disabled people achieve their potential if they are regarded as utterly different from everyone else and in need of segregatio­n and protection rather than inclusion and independen­ce?

Disabled people are often treated like the very old, when even those with the most acute intellects and sardonic sense of humour are dismissed as sexless, harmless “old dears”. Or indeed, similarly to how women in sport used to be treated, when they were forbidden to run 800metres lest their wombs fall out.

The Paralympic­s have certainly showed the impressive and inspiring nature of disabled athletes. But learning that some of them may be imperfect could also perhaps, ironically, be a good thing. Just as women couldn’t achieve equality while we were trapped on pedestals, disabled people and their families must be allowed to have the same range of virtues, flaws and personalit­y traits as everyone. To be seen, in short, as fully human, not superhuman.

Disabled athletes today are, above all, athletes, and the notion that some of them may cheat should be refreshing, not come as a surprise – because cheating is what many athletes do.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom