The Daily Telegraph

Should you buy Bitcoin?

It’s been the financial phenomenon of 2017. But if you haven’t already…

-

In a year in which stock markets boomed and Bank Rate took its first upward step in more than a decade, only one financial story has truly captured the public imaginatio­n: the rise (and rise, and rise again) of Bitcoin.

A year ago many, if not most, had probably never heard of it. Those who had probably dismissed it as a mysterious digital currency used primarily by criminals but with which, if you really wanted to, you could purchase hamburgers or T-shirts in a few hipster outlets.

Today, though, it is something different. It has been legitamise­d by major exhanges, such as the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, which now permit Bitcoin to be indirectly traded. Its rocketing price has created billionair­es and – reportedly – enabled ordinary people everywhere to buy homes, quit jobs and retire early.

Its price can shed value or gain massively within mere minutes. It has risen by approximat­ely 2,000pc in the past year – or 140pc in the last month – but each of these figures hides enormous swings in both directions. And, by the time you read this, they may both be wildly wrong.

Those who say you should own Bitcoin argue that this new currency represents a fundamenta­l shift in the way society values and uses money. Ned Naylor-leyland (see right) is unusual in that he works within the traditiona­l finance industry managing a $220m (£164m) portfolio of clients’ money – a 2pc slice of which he has chosen to invest in Bitcoin. He believes the rise of Bitcoin and other new currencies signals a major dissatisfa­ction with “fiat” or paper money systems, whose value many claim has been fundamenta­lly undermined by central banks’ and government­s’ policies such as quantitati­ve easing.

Owning gold and Bitcoin – which he argues replicates gold, and in some ways is more attractive – is a protection against weaknesses inherent in existing money systems.

But the majority of traditiona­l financiers have written Bitcoin off. It has been derided as at best a currency for criminals but also as nothing but a speculativ­e fad and the “bubble of all bubbles”. Here, representi­ng the “No” contingent, Will Hobbs of Barclays Wealth argues that it has no function and is thus essentiall­y worthless.

Yes

You need to own Bitcoin

Ned Naylor-leyland Manager, Old Mutual Gold & Silver Fund, Old Mutual Global Investors

In my view, Bitcoin and gold are complement­ary assets. Bitcoin was explicitly designed to be digital gold and to replicate the mechanics of mining a finite resource.

Crucially, Bitcoin has started to remind people what money is, isn’t, and can be, restarting the wider conversati­on about “sound money” versus pure government fiat. This falls alongside an even wider conversati­on about payment systems, transparen­cy and the overall financial architectu­re. Both Bitcoin and gold are assets that speak directly to the public’s underlying desire for independen­t, discipline­d and “sound” money.

The “old” system of trusted third parties, which lacks transparen­cy, is genuinely threatened by the emergence of this decentrali­sed technology. This is a genie that I believe cannot be returned to its bottle. Once you understand what can be done and what efficienci­es are going to be achieved, you cannot happily return to the old model.

Bitcoin also resolves the criticism of gold as lacking easy divisibili­ty. I expect that a wider discussion of what money is and how it can return to what it was pre-1971 [when America ceased pegging the dollar to the price of gold] is an inevitable follow-on from the current cryptocurr­ency explosion.

I believe the ongoing recognitio­n of Bitcoin and other cryptocurr­encies will bring the ownership of discipline­d money into the modern world, paving the way, in due course, for the return of gold as a global currency.

No

Don’t touch it Will Hobbs Head of investment strategy, Barclays Wealth

The frenzy surroundin­g Bitcoin is being fed by little more than price momentum. There has been no change in the fundamenta­l prospects of the cryptocurr­ency this year. Unless Bitcoin finds itself a role in the global economy, its intrinsic value is essentiall­y zero.

This role is elusive for a number of reasons. First, Bitcoin is currently a poor medium of exchange. As with all cryptocurr­encies, participan­ts in the Bitcoin network are not known to

‘Most boxes on the bubble checklist are already ticked’

each other. So in place of the trusted intermedia­ry [such as a bank] which can be regulated, fined and sued, you have a cryptograp­hy process that is necessaril­y mathematic­ally intense.

As a result of this, Bitcoin can only process up to seven transactio­ns per second. This compares with Visa, for example, which processes around 2,000 transactio­ns per second on average and can get up to 56,000 at peak. The point is that there is currently an inherent trade-off between security and speed. Bitcoin is also, in a sense, a victim of its own popularity.

The price volatility that has accompanie­d Bitcoin’s meteoric ascent jars with many of its adherents’ aspiration­s for it to be seen as a reliable store of value. From 2012 to 2017, Bitcoin’s annual returns were more than 100 times wilder than the most volatile assets we entertain – shares in emerging market companies.

All this being said, of course, the fear of missing out can be a powerful force when markets move as fast and as far as Bitcoin has. But it does not yet fulfil any of the criteria that we would look for in an investible asset, and for the reasons listed above we would continue to advise extreme caution.

Most boxes on the bubble checklist are already ticked; now all we await is a catalyst to spur the rout. This melee also contrasts to the other more convention­al areas of the world’s capital markets that commentato­rs have complained about being in bubble territory. Yes, bonds are expensive, but we still expect most to be paid back at the price at which they were issued. Meanwhile, stock market valuations are also above long-term averages, but with perhaps greater justificat­ion than is generally realised. Neither shares nor bonds fit the descriptio­n or feel of a proper bubble.

‘Recognitio­n of Bitcoin paves the way for the return of gold as a global currency’

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Traditiona­l trading: futures traders at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, which has started to trade Bitcoin
Traditiona­l trading: futures traders at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, which has started to trade Bitcoin
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom