Funding essentials that defence reviews identify

SIR – It appears that Theresa May and Philip Hammond have made a strategic decision to sacrifice a “tier one” defence capability in order to prioritise spending on the NHS (Comment, June 27). This is disappointing and reflects badly on the Government.

Over the past 20 years, successive prime ministers and chancellors have conducted a number of defence reviews that identified necessary capabilities, but they have consistently failed to fund their delivery properly. Hence the black holes in the defence budget, for which the Ministry of Defence is often berated.

Apart from clinging to the nuclear deterrent, the defence policy, in regard to other essential aspects, is dishonest, hollow and invites challenge from potential enemies. It is not surprising that the US has tired of protecting allies who refuse to pull their weight. William Harris

Southam, Warwickshire

SIR – I was part of the tri-service medical personnel deployed to cover the nationwide ambulance strike of 1989-90. Thirty years ago the military had the resources to ensure people who needed emergency medical help received it. Today I doubt it does.

A gentle reminder that those in the military don’t just fight wars. They take part in search-and-rescue missions, and assist the police and security services. They step in to empty our bins, guard our prisons, drive our ambulances and put out fires when the militant down tools and walk out. Angus Long

Newcastle-upon-tyne