The Daily Telegraph

Brightly colourful and industriou­sly daft

The Merry Wives of Windsor

- Theatre By Dominic Cavendish

RSC, Stratford-upon-avon

The timing of this revival is well-judged. A month or so’s run for Shakespear­e’s comedy on the main stage at Stratford at the end of summer cushions the blow of the dread return to work or school. A stint at the Barbican over Christmas means that Fiona Laird’s brightly colourful and industriou­sly daft production should meet with just the right level of indulgent good spirits. Any other times of the year, I’d fear for its fortunes.

Pepys hated Merry Wives. It didn’t please him at all, “in no part of it”, he griped in August 1667. While you’d need to be spectacula­rly grumpy to remain unmoved to laughter during the whole two-and-a-half-hours here, there’s no escaping the fact that the play is not up there with the Bard’s best. An overt “spin-off ” vehicle for Sir John Falstaff, it was possibly rustled up at Elizabeth I’s behest – an assumption made explicit here in a prologue that has the queen demanding that WS deliver a script within a fortnight.

That prologue actually stretches to a full five minutes or so of set-up business, with an elaborate dumb-show introducin­g the dramatis personae in turn, plus a dance. If the comedy’s primary characteri­stic is that it flogs a joke to death – showing Sir John humiliated not once, not twice but thrice by the “merry wives” Mistresses Page and Ford whose sexual favours (and fat purses) he vainly aspires to avail himself of – Laird’s approach is to flog with particular gusto. With the input of Toby Park (of Spymonkey) as “physical comedy” director, there’s barely a gag-free minute, and each part has been invested with a larger-thanlife set of defining mannerisms.

Placing the action in the suburbs, Shakespear­e broke new ground in satirising the middle-classes, and Merry Wives is often cited as a proto-sitcom. Yet sitcoms tend to amplify social nuances and domestic niggles. The ebullient level of attack here more suggests old-school buffoonery let loose amid a cartoon modern England: mock-tudor housing, Elizabetha­n costume stylings, lashings of bling and dashes of The Only Way is Essex attitude. It looks more like a pre-figuring of Harry Enfield and Chums, and indeed Tom Padley’s Slender resembles a close relation of Enfield’s Tim-nice-but-dim.

Which isn’t to say he isn’t funny. Or that the others aren’t. Laird has assembled a superb cast – headed by David Troughton, whose Falstaff, barrel-bellied (courtesy of a fat-suit) and distractin­gly priapic (a codpiece pushes with vulgar force through his doublet-and-hose), is a start-to-finish delight. But do we feel for him at his climactic humiliatio­n? Some of the pathos goes missing amid the pratfalls.

Perhaps if it tried less hard, it’d be more enjoyable still. Do we need David Acton’s Welsh Parson to start a Bread of Heaven singalong? Then again, to quote another Shakespear­e text: “Reason not the need.” It does the trick.

 ??  ?? Larger than life: David Troughton as Sir John Falstaff and Beth Cordingly as Mistress Ford in The Merry Wives of Windsor
Larger than life: David Troughton as Sir John Falstaff and Beth Cordingly as Mistress Ford in The Merry Wives of Windsor

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom