The Daily Telegraph

What can happen when a Pope kisses your feet?

- CHARLES MOORE NOTEBOOK READ MORE at telegraph.co.uk/opinion

It was moving to watch Pope Francis kiss the feet (or, to be absolutely accurate, the shoes) of the warring leaders of South Sudan last week. In human terms, it was particular­ly touching because the Pope is an old man, so his physical effort added to the gesture of humility.

As it happens, I met one of those leaders, Riek Machar, when I visited South Sudan a few years ago. Despite holding a PHD in Philosophy and Strategic Planning from the University of Bradford, he is something of a rough diamond. I would not have risked kissing his feet myself. But that, of course, is only the more reason for Pope Francis to have done so: great sinners have great need.

The story of South Sudan shows how much divine help is required. At the time I met Dr Machar, his country had just emerged from many years of tyranny under the government of North Sudan – whose appalling ruler, Omar al-bashir, was finally removed in a coup last week after 30 years of wrongdoing. South Sudan thus became a place enjoying new freedom.

That feeling came partly from the fact that it is mainly Christian:

the Khartoum government which oppressed it had once harboured Osama bin Laden. It was run by extreme Islamists who persecuted Christians. So when the leaders of this new Christian country later turned on one another and began killing, this represente­d spiritual as well as political failure.

Last week’s Vatican setting for reconcilia­tion was appropriat­e, not only because of religious prestige but also because the occasion was ecumenical. It was a spiritual retreat involving the Pope, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, and a former moderator of the Church of Scotland. Their denominati­ons are all represente­d in South Sudan, and among its leaders.

The reconcilia­tion, therefore, was not just between politician­s but once-warring churches. Neither Catholics nor Protestant­s would have dared seek such a gathering until recent times. The church civil war which began at the Reformatio­n raged for roughly 400 years. Even today, it still smoulders.

Archbishop Welby spoke of the Pope’s action as showing “the power of weakness”. This was exactly the right phrase, especially in this week before Easter, which commemorat­es the power of weakness that Jesus displayed in his own life and death.

On Thursday, I shall be helping at our local Mass. Every Mass recalls Jesus’s Last Supper, but this one above all, because it falls on its day. One of my duties will be to tag along with the basin of water as the priest washes the feet of 12 parishione­rs, as Jesus did for his 12 apostles. In his small way, the priest does what Pope Francis is doing, and what Jesus did first.

Does it work, though? The seemingly obvious answer is: “Usually, no.” People pray constantly for peace, and sometimes meet their opponents to do so. They often forgive one another – or say they have done so – and then kick off all over again. There is no overwhelmi­ng reason to think that Dr Machar and his enemies will not restart their battles, even though a real, live pope has begged them, literally on bended knee, not to.

But against that gloomy answer, two points can be made. The first is that sometimes people’s hearts really are turned. Ever since St Paul fell off his horse on the road to Damascus, stopped persecutin­g Jesus and started following him, this has happened.

The second matters more, because it always applies. It is not that religion cures the defects of mankind: it is that it enables mankind to recognise what those defects are. We do wrong, but the concept of wrong means nothing without a concept of right. Religion captures and dramatises this; seldom more than when an old man of power kneels.

These gestures will not work, however, if people suspect their motives. So I was dismayed to hear on BBC Radio 4 an expert give a context for Pope Francis’s public acts which suggested they should be seen as a long-running crusade (I don’t think that sensitive word was actually used) against Donald Trump. Follow whatever President Trump does, said this sage – on climate change immigratio­n, Muslims etc – and you will see Pope Francis following behind to say the opposite.

Steve Bannon, formerly Trump’s populist guru, seems to agree, and recently spoke of the Pope as “the enemy”.

I really hope this is not true. Naturally, any pope should criticise the mighty without fear or favour, but to set him himself up against one elected leader demeans his role.

When John Paul II, coming out of persecuted Poland, told people, in his first sermon as Pope, “Be not afraid”, no one could reduce his message to “We’re coming after you, you Commie bastards”, although of course Communists feared him for what he said (and probably tried to kill him). He spoke to all Christians, indeed to all people.

There is plenty to dislike about President Trump. Although people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones, I venture to guess that he is exceptiona­lly un-christian in his attitudes. But the Pope should not be the anti-trump. Wearing the shoes of the fisherman, he has other fish to fry.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom