The Daily Telegraph

The magic of love letters shone through this sad story

-

Itry not to, I really do, since I know full well he’s an awardwinni­ng actor who’s just turned 30 (it’s his birthday today, in fact). However, I still can’t help thinking that Daniel Radcliffe actually is Harry Potter. I partly blame the fact that my children are potty for Potter and the eight films are in constant rotation at home.

Thus, when I came to watch Radcliffe’s edition of Who Do You

Think You Are? (BBC One), I halfexpect­ed a bespectacl­ed orphan to discover that his parents were murdered by an evil wizard without a nose.

Of course, this didn’t happen. Without a wand or a Weasley in sight, Radcliffe delved into his ancestry and uncovered two heart-wrenching stories, both told via correspond­ence.

First he learned that the robbery of his great-grandfathe­r Samuel Gershon’s Hatton Garden jewellery business was far darker and more scandalous than he ever imagined. We never definitive­ly found out who did it, but the police, influenced by anti-semitism, suspected an inside job for insurance fraud and the shame drove poor Samuel to take his own life. His suicide note to wife Raie was so full of adoration, it moved Radcliffe to tears. “I want to reach into the past

and comfort him,” he said.

On his father’s side of the family, a cache of his great-great-uncle Ernest Mcdowell’s letters from the First World War trenches conjured up another emotional romance. Having served alongside his three brothers, Ernie was the only one not to make it home. Happily, though, he’d married his sweetheart Jeannie in their local church on Valentine’s Day while home on leave. Their billets-doux were endearingl­y passionate.

Throughout the journey, Radcliffe was wide-eyed with wonder and endearingl­y articulate. “Everyone in my family was really loved,” he concluded. “Ultimately that means the time they had on Earth, even if it ended prematurel­y and sadly, was worth having.”

The genealogy stalwart, now on its 16th series and fresh from another Bafta win, remains consistent­ly superb. Its latest line-up of celebritie­s – including Kate Winslet and Paul Merton over the coming weeks – promises to be another corker. Radcliffe got it off to an absorbing, affecting start. Four points to Gryffindor. Michael Hogan

The closing episode of the second series of Big Little Lies (Sky Atlantic) delivered nothing like the wallop of the first season finale.

This US series, focusing on five women’s lives in the affluent California­n coastal city of Monterey, was water-cooler TV the first time around, in 2017. This time, the buzz has been somewhat lacking, although rarely has the calibre of the show actually dipped.

Controvers­y swirled recently, generated by a report that British director Andrea Arnold, brought in for the new series, had had her work re-edited (by a man). But showrunner David E Kelley’s tight script, and strong performanc­es from the show’s A-list cast meant that, honestly, it would be hard to detect any failure of nerve unless you knew to look for it.

In fact, this episode was the first of seven to have had any discernibl­e longueurs, a sense of drift as various storylines were tied up, slightly unsatisfac­torily. And yes, that made a dull hour if you compared it to the jaw-dropping shock of the death of violent husband Perry Wright that ended series one. But not if you compare it to your average TV drama.

Here still was Nicole Kidman mesmerisin­g in her incarnatio­n of Celeste, a woman poised perilously between triumph and disaster. Here were children acting with such naturalism that you’d think them prodigies. And here too was Meryl Streep, making wickedness sympatheti­c as her character, Perry’s mother Mary Louise, finally, thankfully, got her comeuppanc­e.

The episode did have frustratio­ns: why would Celeste have kept back the informatio­n she knew could destroy Mary Louise for so long? Why on earth would the Monterey Five decide, unanimousl­y, it was in their interests to tell the truth about Perry’s death (that they’d pretended was an accident) – except to provide a season cliffhange­r? Why has it been so hard to care about Bonnie’s (Zoe Kravitz) storyline?

But the drama’s attempt to portray the messiness of marriages, the strange wisdom of children, the personal disasters hidden behind life’s daily detritus is still sophistica­ted, curiously non-judgmental and, ultimately, powerfully moving. Bring on series three. Serena Davies

Who Do You Think You Are? ★★★★ Big Little Lies ★★★★

 ??  ?? Meet the family: Daniel Radcliffe opened the new series of Who Do You Think You Are?
Meet the family: Daniel Radcliffe opened the new series of Who Do You Think You Are?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom