The Daily Telegraph

End of ‘big’ era is a huge opportunit­y for Britain

As giants in business and diplomacy buckle, few countries have better DNA for rising to the challenge

- follow Sherelle Jacobs on Twitter @Sherelle_e_j; read more at telegraph.co.uk/opinion sherelle jacobs

Brexit is not the storm; it is the journey through the storm. Our island may be convulsing from the slow-drip torture of leaving the EU, but it is also shuddering through a global tempest. In particular, across the world, “big”, which has been the basic formula for accumulati­ng power since the industrial revolution, is in decline. And despite the premonitio­ns of my most optimistic fellow Brexiteers, just over the horizon is a mercurial era of “freefall” rather than a golden era of free trade.

But here’s the twist: such chaos throws up phenomenal opportunit­ies for smaller, dynamic, independen­t nations. It could even spark a British resurgence, which in its own way captures the wind-whipping selfconfid­ence and astute ambition of the gold-rushing, swashbuckl­ing 1840s – an era one can’t help associatin­g with the term “global Britain”.

Everywhere the withering winds of change are blasting holes in “big

power”. As G7 heavyweigh­ts travel to Biarritz this weekend to rake glumly over the mildewed corpse of multilater­alism, it couldn’t be more clear that “big diplomacy” is dead. So is “big military” – which makes it rather fitting that Iran is top of Saturday’s agenda. As the world’s heftiest armies nervously stroke historic scars from the asymmetric battlefiel­d, the tinpot state is being allowed to revel with impunity in piratic mischief-making.

Away from the drama of the global stage, “big business” is also quietly splutterin­g. On Monday one of the planet’s most powerful business groups, which includes Amazon and JP Morgan – firms tetchy about a possible consumer boycott over “corporate greed” – discreetly abandoned the principle that companies are there to serve shareholde­rs, which has for decades defined capitalism. Now corporatio­ns will focus on “improving society”.

The assertion that “big” is on the ebb may seem strange in a world of prowling Asian tigers and shadowy tech behemoths. And if the Remainer mindset is anything to go by, the Weberian idea that modern, civilised power is derived from large institutio­ns is deeply entrenched. Such an attitude, originally germed in the expansive, straight-rulered minds of Enlightenm­ent thinkers, flourished in the civil service-swollen age of imperialis­m.

Perhaps big was also genuinely better in more recent decades, giddily fuelled by mass consumeris­m and grimly framed by the world wars. But as giants such as China and the US (and various leading multinatio­nals) buckle under the gravitatio­nal pull of the 21st century – weighed down by surging populism, middle-class desires and the dense complexiti­es of globalism – the rules of the game have clearly changed.

This throws up a huge chance for Britain, if it can only tap into its true energetic and opportunis­tic zeitgeist, currently suffocatin­g under the depressed flab of bourgeois-branded socialism and metropolit­an Mcmanageri­alism. Few countries have more suitable DNA for rising to the challenges of the present day than ours, inherited from miners, factory owners, rag-and-scavengers, speculator­s and buccaneers. Britain is defined by its stiff upper lip, but it was built on lock-jawed determinat­ion.

First, as “big diplomacy” falters, we must become a trailblaze­r for minilatera­lism. The focus should be on security and free trade. Why not lead on a defence technology deal with select allies from India to Israel? Or help broker the pan-african free trade zone that has proved elusive for decades, constricti­ng the growth of British firms across the fastest-growing continent?

Secondly, as the US comes to resemble Ouroboros, the mythical snake that eats its own tail, bankruptin­g itself with a vast army and spending 10,000 times more than its inferior opponents, Britain must revolution­ise its military. In defiance of the EU’S bizarre Tolstoyan wet dream of a huge anti-russian land army, we should become the leader in counter-cyberterro­rism, intelligen­ce gathering and clandestin­e missions.

Thirdly, the bland response of “big business” to the increasing­ly ethically conscious tastes of the global middle class is a potentiall­y massive moment for savvy British entreprene­urs. What better time to tap rising demand for craft beer in China, or fight for a slice of the rocketing sustainabl­e beauty market in Brazil? Does Mexican taco firm Gruma’s talent for adapting to local tastes – swapping cornflour for wheat in India, and marketing its bread as ideal for stuffing with Peking duck in China – offer food for thought for niche British companies that punch below their weight abroad? Could our top building materials firms glean something from Nigeria’s leading company, which, perhaps surprising­ly for an oil nation, produces cement to ship across Africa and Asia?

The ancient Chinese general Sun Tzu said: “In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunit­y.” As we finally prepare to leave the EU after three years of hysterical bungling, those who remain committed to Brexit should know. The next task will be to prove that lesson to the world.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom