The Daily Telegraph

As statecraft collapses, the blame game begins

An incendiary missive from Downing Street sets up a day of strife among Brexit’s main players

- By Camilla Tominey ASSOCIATE EDITOR, James Crisp in Brussels and Peter Foster EUROPE EDITOR

WITH Brexit timed for Hallowe’en, the days leading up to the UK’S planned exit from the EU on Oct 31 were always expected to get tricky. But as yesterday’s incendiary No10 memo appeared to signal the end for Britain’s already tortured negotiatio­ns with Brussels – the blame game for what was fast emerging as a spectacula­r failure of statecraft began in earnest.

Bearing all the hallmarks of Dominic Cummings, the Prime Minister’s chief strategist, the explosive missive – sent overnight to James Forsyth, political editor of The Spectator – pointed the finger at Leo Varadkar’s “gamble on a second referendum”. Which must have made last night’s 40-minute phone call between Boris Johnson and the Irish Taoiseach a little awkward.

In a stark warning to Dublin and Brussels, the statement added: “If this deal dies in the next few days, then it won’t be revived... We will also make clear that this government will not negotiate further so any delay would be totally pointless.”

The Downing Street salvo also made clear that the Conservati­ves would fight an election on “the basis of ‘no more delays, get Brexit done immediatel­y’” in a bid to outflank Nigel Farage’s Brexit Party.

“We’ll either leave with no deal on Oct 31 or there will be an election and then we will leave with no deal,” it said, confident that “over half of the public will agree with us” rather than colluding with a parliament “as popular as the clap”.

Such an unpreceden­ted briefing naturally aroused suspicions across the Channel where an EU diplomat remarked: “The whole message is a message for domestic consumptio­n not on behalf of a government that wants to do a deal.” Another EU source said the statement “looked like they were trying to frame a villain”.

Angela Merkel was next in the firing line. Following what was described as a “frank exchange” between Mr Johnson and the German Chancellor, a Downing Street source said a Brexit deal was “essentiall­y impossible” because of Merkel’s insistence that Northern Ireland must remain in a customs union with the EU – seemingly a goalpost shift from the all-ireland backstop that had previously been discussed.

Again EU diplomats were keen to cast doubt. “It doesn’t sound like something she would say,” said one, as a former member of Theresa May’s cabinet described No10’s account of the conversati­on as “about as convincing as Dick Van Dyke’s cockney accent”.

A spokesman for the European Commission insisted “nothing had changed”, adding: “We are working for a deal.” Since technical talks were due to continue, she could not see “how the talks could have broken down”.

By the time David Frost, Mr Johnson’s EU sherpa, had arrived for talks with European Commission officials at noon, a UK spokesman insisted negotiatio­ns on the protocol and the political declaratio­n would continue apace.

“These talks are reaching a critical point. The UK has moved a long way, and now we need to see movement from the EU side. Today’s technical discussion­s are continuing to find a resolution ahead of the European Council.”

Yet it soon became clear that European Council president Donald Tusk was far from readying himself to roll out the red carpet for the Prime Minister at next week’s crunch summit. In an characteri­stically combative tweet, he railed: “Boris Johnson, what’s at stake is not winning some stupid blame game. At stake is the future of Europe and the UK as well as the security and interests of our people. You don’t want a deal, you don’t want an extension, you don’t want to revoke, quo vadis?”

While the meaning would not have been lost on classics scholar Mr Johnson, “quo vadis” then began trending on Twitter. Commonly translated as “Where are you marching?”, the Latin phrase dates back to the apocryphal Acts of St Peter.

Sources close to Tusk later suggested that his biblical tweet was directed more at Mr Cummings than his boss.

Simon Coveney, the Irish foreign minister, retweeted Tusk, commenting: “Hard to disagree –

‘You don’t want a deal, you don’t want an extension, you don’t want to revoke, quo vadis?’

reflects the frustratio­n across EU and the enormity of what’s at stake for us all. We remain open to finalise a fair deal but need a UK Govt willing to work with EU to get it done.”

It came with the revelation that growth in Ireland’s economy was forecast to decelerate from 5.5 per cent this year to 0.7 per cent next year in the event of a hard Brexit.

Coveney, who met with Michel Barnier, the EU’S chief negotiator, last night, later said: “Donald Tusk was reflecting the level of frustratio­n and concern among member states that the focus has shifted to the blame game rather than trying to solve this problem,” before himself trying to shift the blame with the words: “A no deal will never be Ireland’s choice. It will never be the choice of the EU.”

Similarly, German sources stressed that Merkel would work until the “last moment” to get a deal, pointing out that it was no secret the UK’S customs proposals were problemati­c for the EU.

Norbert Rottgen, the head of the

Bundestag’s foreign affairs committee, told Die Welt, the German daily broadsheet, that Mr Johnson was “stuck in a Brexit hardliners’ trap with no room for manoeuvre”.

Support for Mr Johnson came in the form of DUP leader “Come On” Arlene Foster, the government’s confidence and supply partner, who said Merkel’s comments revealed the “real objective of Dublin and the EU” to keep Northern Ireland locked in the EU customs union forever.

“We will not accept any such ultimatum or outcome,” she warned.

Describing the Irish backstop as “beyond crazy”, the punchy statement, posted on the DUP’S Twitter feed, appeared to suggest that the Unionists, like their Tory partners, were inching ever-closer to a no deal.

Yet with both Britain and Ireland briefing that both sides still strongly desired a deal after the 40-minute pow-wow, the day that began with guns at dawn appeared to end with a cease fire of sorts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom