The Daily Telegraph

Facebook’s anti-vaxx profits

Social media giant allows new parents to be targeted by companies peddling homeopathi­c ‘alternativ­es’

- By Katherine Rushton deputy investigat­ions editor

FACEBOOK has been accused of “appalling” behaviour after it allowed advertiser­s offering “vaccine alternativ­es” to deliberate­ly target new parents.

The company said in March that it would “reject” adverts that included “misinforma­tion about vaccines”.

However, a Telegraph investigat­ion found that it is boosting its profits by allowing advertiser­s to peddle unproven treatments purporting to offer an “alternativ­e” to vaccinatio­ns.

Alarmingly, it allows the advertiser­s to ensure their content is seen by parents – even if they have never demonstrat­ed any interest in deviating from the vaccinatio­ns on the NHS schedule.

It also permits advertiser­s to offer homeopathi­c “autism cures” to parents who have sought “support”.

Damian Collins, chairman of the digital, culture, media and sport select committee, condemned the practice as “appalling”, adding: “Things like this pose a real danger to people’s safety.”

Facebook said that while it did not want misinforma­tion on its network, its combinatio­n of automated and human reviewers would not “catch every ad as it is created”. “We will act on any ads that are reported to us,” it added.

FACEBOOK is boosting its profits by allowing advertiser­s to cynically target new parents with homeopathi­c “vaccine alternativ­es”, a Daily Telegraph investigat­ion has found. The social media giant is auctioning off advertisin­g space for up to 18p per click to anyone peddling controvers­ial homeopathi­c remedies beloved by anti-vaxxers.

Alarmingly, advertiser­s can ensure their content is shown to people whose children are of MMR vaccinatio­n age, and who may never have displayed any interest in alternativ­es to the immunisati­ons recommende­d by the NHS.

In March, Facebook pledged to “reject” adverts spreading anti-vaccine misinforma­tion.

However, reporters at this newspaper found that the web giant still allows adverts offering “homeopathi­c vaccinatio­n alternativ­es”, or treatment for supposed “vaccine injury”. It also allows adverts promoting homeopathi­c “autism cures” to be targeted at parents whose online search history shows they have been seeking support for autism.

Last night, Damian Collins, the chairman of the culture, media and sport select committee, said: “It’s appalling that Facebook will allow people to target vulnerable people such as parents seeking informatio­n that could help their children, and allow peddlers of bogus remedies to use Facebook ad tools to target those people. I find it astonishin­g that Facebook did not spot this, and stop it.”

Telegraph journalist­s set up a website purporting to be a homeopathi­c business offering a series of controvers­ial therapies. In an advert on Facebook, it boasted that it specialise­s in “vaccine alternativ­es for kids, vaccine injury, Cease therapy and autism cures”.

Cease therapy – Complete Eliminatio­n of Autistic Spectrum Expression – is a controvers­ial autism “treatment” that has no scientific evidence to support it. But Facebook’s only objection to the Telegraph’s advert was that the reporter had originally spelt the word “Cease” in capital letters – and not in the lower-case text it prefers.

Once the journalist­s changed the text to ‘Cease’, the social media firm accepted the advert.

It also allowed reporters to target it at “new parents (0-12 months)”, “parents with pre-schoolers (3-5 years)” and “parents with toddlers (aged 1-2)” – the age groups when they are due to receive most of their vaccinatio­ns, according to the NHS schedule. Facebook said yesterday: “We do not want ads that include widely debunked misinforma­tion or make misleading and unsubstant­iated claims on our platform. When we find them, we’ll reject them.”

Google, too, allowed journalist­s to run adverts casting doubt on the safety of vaccines and offering dubious treatments for autism. But it later admitted that the advert broke its policy around autism and removed it.

Unlike Facebook, it did not allow the “advertiser” to target users with no demonstrab­le interest in homeopathy or Cease therapy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom