Experienced ‘amateurs’ could offer added protection in the Channel

sir – The idea of second-hand patrol boats, in conjunction with light spotter aeroplanes (Letters, December 28), might help stem the flood of illegal immigrants. It would also free up both the Royal Navy and the Border Force to confront drugs and arms smugglers, unlawful fishermen, real criminals and the Queen’s enemies in general.

However, in both the RN and RAF there is a manpower problem. As the crews of the proposed small vessels and light aircraft need not be trained to service standards, may I suggest the reintroduction of the Second World War’s successful Royal Naval Volunteer (Supplementary) Reserve, along with an RAF equivalent?

Before 1939, the ranks of the RNV (S) R were drawn from yachtsmen, trawler men and general seamen, and were available on an “as required” basis. These experienced “amateurs” conducted their own training and received no pay, yet were irreplaceable once employed (and paid) in manning the country’s coastal forces.

Sadly for me, if this were implemented now I do not see the age limit being increased from 25 to 78.

Ewen Southby-tailyour

Ermington, South Devon

sir – Commander Bill Nimmo-scott (Letters, December 28) criticises my suggestion to use second-hand motor yachts to patrol the Channel and deter people smugglers en route from France to Britain, but his reference to HMS Wakeful, which had to be replaced by a purpose-built ship, seems to me to be irrelevant.

One also wonders whether Cdr Nimmo-scott has ever been aboard a medium-sized superyacht.

Most are equipped with highly reliable and well-supported diesel engines designed for the marine environment and capable of ocean crossings; “ruggedising” would not be required. Reinforcing the sides would be unnecessary to support a machinegun type weapon such as is frequently mounted on the beds of trucks. They also have accommodation for two or three crew, as well as six or more guests, spacious saloons and wellequipped galleys.

The only stripping-out needed would be the luxury pile carpets and bedding, and, of course, they all have state-of-the-art navigation and communications equipment.

Lt Cdr David Wright RN (retd) Galston, New South Wales, Australia

sir – I cannot understand the policy being operated towards migrants crossing the Channel.

Yes, they will have destroyed their documentation, which may make decisions problematic. However, we do know they have come from France, where they are not being persecuted.

They should be returned to France at once, which is the international rule. What is the point of rules if they are never applied?

Mick Ferrie

Falmouth, Cornwall sir – What would Nelson have done?

Marron Lovett

Poole, Dorset