The Daily Telegraph

For all the horror, the US jobless numbers are not as bad as they seem

Lay-offs are a ‘temporary’ measure – but the benefits system is battling to cope with weight of demand

-

The US jobs cataclysm is not as terrifying as it looks. Part of it is real; another part is a statistica­l mirage caused by the enforced shutdown. The 22m surge in unemployme­nt claims over the last four weeks has nothing in common with any previous recession, let alone the dole trauma of the Thirties. “It is really a good news story,” said Prof Karen Dynan, former assistant US treasury secretary in the Obama era and now at Harvard University. “Disaster relief has been well designed and is working.”

Big employers in California – compelled to declare their intentions by state law – say that 93pc of lay-offs are “temporary”, a term that has legal and contractua­l implicatio­ns under US labour laws. During the Lehman bust of 2008-2009 the jobs purge was almost entirely “permanent” as companies rushed to slash costs and restructur­e their businesses.

A “real-time” study by Arizona State University says the unemployme­nt rate is already 20pc and fast approachin­g the headline levels of the Great Depression (lagged official data has yet to catch up). But this figure can be misinterpr­eted. Europe and the US are not as different as they look.

Europe has Kurzarbeit programmes. These entail subsidies for firms to hold on to idle workers through the crisis. The effect is to repress headline unemployme­nt rates. The UK has its job retention scheme. Salaries are being covered by the state – partially or fully – in different countries until the lockdown is over.

America has reached more or less the same macroecono­mic outcome by different means, using its flexible markets as a shock absorber and as a springboar­d for quick recovery later. The “corona-jobless” are receiving $600 (£480) a week in emergency aid on top of other (limited) benefits, which can amount to a rise in pay for poorer workers. It is surprising­ly progressiv­e for a Republican administra­tion. This is not a repeat of 2008 when blacks and minorities – “last hired, first fired” – carried the brunt of the shock. Steven Mnuchin, the treasury secretary, is spearheadi­ng the response in concert with the Democrats on Capitol Hill, and with state governors. This “national team” is operating in a parallel universe from president Donald Trump’s surreal and contradict­ory ramblings each day. Most of the jobless and their families are able to roll over their health insurance through the federal Cobra scheme. Prof Dynan said there is broad “political and social buy-in” for the mix of emergency measures. This cuts across normal ideologica­l lines. There are logjams, headaches and delays. The newly unemployed are struggling to navigate federal websites. Michigan’s state filing system crashed completely after the car industry shut down. Whole categories of laid-off workers have to telephone in person to secure aid but the lines are swamped. One woman in New York said she had to call 800 times before getting through.

Others say the money has not yet arrived. The self-employed are still falling through cracks. Hence the astonishin­g footage of thousands of cars lining up at a single food bank in San Antonio, Texas. “The aid is just not getting through. The system is creaking at the seams and overwhelme­d,” said Prof Danny

Blanchflow­er, a labour economist at Dartmouth University and a former UK rate-setter. “A fifth of the country basically has no income. Nothing. Zero. These people are spending everything they have left on food and they can’t wait until September, or whenever, for the first cheque.”

Beth Ann Bovino, from Standard & Poor’s, said it will take years for unemployme­nt to come down to pre-crisis years. “Turning on the US economy isn’t like turning on a light bulb,” she said. The chaos is understand­able. Initial jobless claims each week have jumped to 153 times normal levels in California and Virginia, 171 times in Indiana, and 195 times in Michigan – where furious protesters have demanded an end to

‘Stock markets are pricing a rapid rebound on premise it is a one-off shock, followed by testing and tracing’

the lockdown, a few armed with semi-automatic rifles and sporting militia garb. Prof Dynan said most workers will be rehired quickly once the economy reopens, without lasting damage to America’s productive system, known as hysteresis.

“The unemployme­nt rate will be back down to single digits by the end of the year. But many in vulnerable sectors like restaurant­s and travel will not get their jobs back and that is going to leave scarring,” she said.

The pandemic has been the coup de grâce for “old retail”. The department shopping chain JC Penney missed a bond payment on Wednesday and is now in default. It has furloughed most of its 90,000 employees. Its 850 stores may not survive. Nordstrom has warned of financial distress. Macy’s is exploring restructur­ing and has laid off nearly all of its 125,00 employees.

Stock markets are pricing a rapid rebound in the US. The premise is that the lockdown is a one-off shock, to be followed by a testing and tracing regime that keeps the virus contained. But that hi-tech solution may not be ready at sufficient scale in time.

The jobless relief measures run out after a couple of months. They are not set up for a long siege. So what happens if the country faces a second wave? “I fear that we will have to keep shutting down the economy. Unemployme­nt could be near 30pc. There is potential for social disorder,” said Prof Blanchflow­er. It might no longer feel temporary as a cascade of defaults turns what began as an economic sudden stop into a systemic financial crisis as well.

Even a lesser sequence of partial lockdowns would drain business confidence and keep investment in deep freeze. Hank Paulson, treasury secretary during the Lehman crisis, says America will never be the same again. “The pandemic crisis has laid bare the fact that we have unsustaina­ble levels of income disparity in the US, with too many people living paycheck to paycheck, afraid of the wolf at the door,” he said.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom