The Daily Telegraph

European Union should learn to love no deal

Brussels thinks a diverging Britain would be a threat, but it could make the rest of the continent richer too

- Matthew Lynn

Years will be spent taking the British Government to court for breaking internatio­nal law. The UK will be treated like a pariah state. Lorries will be held up at Calais, and holidaymak­ers will face long queues at airports in Malaga and Corfu. With final negotiatio­ns over a trade deal with the European Union just a whisker away from finally, and irreparabl­y, breaking down, officials in Brussels seem intent on making the price Britain has to pay for that as high as possible.

But hold on. In truth, that doesn’t make much sense. Leaving without a free trade agreement can work perfectly well for the British, but it could work for the EU as well.

Why? Because, if the people and member states of Europe cared to think about it, a UK that diverges from EU regulation­s would provide a check on Brussels’ mania for rule-making; because an offshore hub can feed investment into the rest of the continent; and because we could be better off, and so will import even more of their stuff.

Without a deal, Britain should be wealthier, but Europe should be as well. It is a win-win outcome – for everyone except a few federalist fanatics, that is.

It is still just about possible that the UK will manage to strike a trade deal with the EU once our transition­al arrangemen­t expires at the end of this year. But you wouldn’t want to bet anything of any value on it right now. The negotiatio­ns remain fraught and angry, and British attempts to revisit the Withdrawal Agreement may mean that the talks are now in the terminal stage. It would take a miracle to save them, and those are usually in short supply.

The City forecaster­s already calculate that “no deal” is the most likely outcome, and it is hard to disagree with that verdict. A few diehard Remainers aside, the British have reconciled themselves to that. Across the rest of the continent, however, it is still viewed as a disaster. Many think the British should be made to pay a high price for their intransige­nce. And yet, if only they could calm down for a second, European government­s should be able to work out that leaving without any arrangemen­t can work for them as well. Here’s why.

First, the UK will be freed from EU rules, standards and taxes. What we will do with that freedom remains to be seen. But over time, we will gradually evolve different systems from the rest of Europe, and try out different policies. Right now, the EU thinks that is terrible, arguing that we will undercut their model with “social dumping”. But in fact, regulatory, legal and tax rivalry is just as useful as every other sort of competitio­n.

A Britain outside of the EU’S regulatory orbit will be able to provide an alternativ­e model, and it will be a check on the over-centralise­d, meddling, tax-hungry instincts of the Brussels machine. That might be a bother for a few commission­ers with an overinflat­ed sense of their own importance. But it would be far better for the Eurozone economy – which could sure use a lighter tax burden, and a little less interferen­ce.

Next, we could effectivel­y become Europe’s Hong Kong. It is unlikely we will turn into Singapore-on-thames (even if, personally, I think that would be great). But a slightly more freewheeli­ng, more lightly regulated, more tech-friendly, and entreprene­urial UK could well become a conduit for investment into the continenta­l mainland.

In that sense, Hong Kong has been hugely valuable to the Chinese economy over the last two decades, funnelling countless billions of investment into the country, and Singapore has played much the same role for south-east Asia. Offshore hubs are sometimes a threat, but they are often also a great way of raising extra capital – and Britain, and especially the City, could play that role.

Finally, the UK should be richer. It is hard to make any calculatio­ns amid the Covid-19 crisis. Right now everyone is getting poorer at an alarming rate.

But put that to one side, if possible. With our own tariffs, our own trade deals, with control over our own industrial strategy, and with a regulatory regime designed for our own strengths, over time the UK should become a wealthier country. What will we do with the extra money? Obviously enough, we will spend it on importing more stuff from the rest of Europe, just as we always do.

True, there is one massive problem. If we leave without a deal, and it is a success, and the economy does fine, then it might encourage other European countries to do the same. It certainly won’t deter them. Perhaps that will happen, and perhaps it won’t. And yet, in truth, no other country is as well-placed to break away from the EU as Britain is.

The Brussels machine may not be able to grasp it, but at this fraught stage of the negotiatio­ns, an amicable “no deal” is by far the best outcome. The EU should call off its lawyers, and forget about retaliatio­n, and agree to that – because it is in its interests as well as ours.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom