The Daily Telegraph

Testing is a distractio­n from the true Covid crisis

The Government’s strategy doesn’t work in the real world, and risks repeating the errors of the first wave

- Sherelle jacobs

Botched Britain or psychosoma­tic nation? As the broken testing system damns the country to a de facto lockdown, with runny-nosed children banned from school and sniffy Londoners pretending they live in Aberdeen to get a test, you’d be forgiven for thinking incompeten­ce is the story of the day. But if a scandal is unfolding, it’s not that we are failing to implement the right strategy, but that we have the wrong one altogether.

An alliance of blue-sky politician­s and blinkered epidemiolo­gists is determined to will a perfect universe into existence. One where we can suppress Covid-19 through aggressive nationwide testing until a vaccine materialis­es. In this computermo­delled nirvana, basic obstacles are mere illusions based on negative or selfish thinking – like the slowness of medical innovation, and the need to sustain that pesky little thing known as an economy.

Such a rigidly theoretica­l approach to the UK’S crisis threatens to plunge us into a downward spiral of government deception, mass hypochondr­ia and bankruptcy. It also risks a repeat of the fatal mistake we made with the first wave: failure to protect the vulnerable.

The experts are correct. Routine mass testing is the ideal way to prevent a second wave while keeping the economy going. But it is reckless to pretend that, as things stand, it is realistic. In a perfect world, the Government would have stimulated the market for Covid detection right at the start of this crisis, allowing firms to stay open provided they rapidly identified cases. At the same time, ministers would have provided juicy subsidies to private testing companies. This could have triggered huge investment followed by huge innovation, with tests becoming faster and more accurate. We may then have been much closer to that sweet spot of routinely mass testing the entire population every five days to keep the R number stable.

Except we don’t live in that perfect world. We live in a Red Tory state that doesn’t have enough lab technician­s to process results. The PM’S Operation Moonshot is a dud. It will crowd out entreprene­urs in favour of a few mega-firms and send false positives soaring.

The latter point is crucial. Covid tests are flawed. Many are likely overdiagno­sing cases as they pick up dead viral load. As testing is ramped up, so are false positives. Therefore, although hospital admissions in places like Bolton are undoubtedl­y on the up, the uptick of positive cases that has sent the country into fresh spasms of hysteria may be wildly overstatin­g the true situation.

Covid testing is riddled with other complicati­ons: it does not tell us whether the viral load detected is actually infectious, for example. This means thousands of people may already be self-isolating unnecessar­ily. Routine testing systems that do not include second confirmato­ry tests for those who test positive compound the errors. Put simply, we are heading for a winter of endless false alarms and institutio­nalised hypochondr­ia.

Eminently sensible Professor Chris Whitty is correct in his push to prioritise testing for NHS workers. But the Government needs to go further, and ditch its disastrous population testing strategy.

Instead No10 should put all its energies into routine testing for care homes and the NHS. It needs to focus the minds of its modellers on transmissi­on among the elderly rather than among children, ignoring the Imperial College trendsette­rs who this week announced yet another study into how kids spread Covid-19. Ministers need to perfect infection control measures in hospitals, from PPE and Covid-friendly ventilatio­n to techniques preventing supersprea­ding through routine procedures like intubation. And we need better hospital and primary care surveillan­ce systems that can tell us what is actually going on in the NHS in comparison to the wider community.

Perhaps No10’s reluctance to boldly shift from a suppress to a protect strategy strikes at the Western health establishm­ent’s most fatal mistake in the pandemic. Everyone, from the EU and the British Government to Bill Gates, assumed the next big pandemic would be influenza. When Covid struck, we went with the only plan we had – a flu game plan that overlooked the most simple lesson of previous coronaviru­s outbreaks, not least SARS which ripped through Asian care homes and exploded early on in hospitals: protect the vulnerable. Unsurprisi­ngly, up to a quarter of British Covid victims have caught coronaviru­s in hospital. Care homes account for more than half of Covid-related UK deaths. That the virus is again spiralling in nursing homes (detected in 43 and counting this month) is a scandal.

Perhaps the failure is so breathtaki­ngly basic that the politician­s can’t quite face it. Or perhaps the experts just hate to be wrong. Take Prof Neil Ferguson – who has over the last 15 years found a nice little niche modelling pandemics with data collected from historical flu outbreaks. His notorious Report 9 was based on a modified flu simulation that failed to incorporat­e crucial insights from previous coronaviru­s pandemics. But far from recanting his doom-mongering modelling, he merely insists lockdown didn’t come quickly enough. Such stupendous self-delusion at the top table doesn’t bode well for the future.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom