More tolerant Taliban is music to villagers’ ears
In the Taliban controlled-fields and villages of central Helmand, residents report a sound that would once never have been allowed – music blaring from mobile phones. The playing of music would once have earned a swift beating or humiliating punishment from the militant movement’s austere local enforcers. Now they turn a blind eye.
“The Taliban have changed a lot on some things,” said Mohammad Saber, a farmer from Nad-e Ali. “They are much less serious about many things, like music, television and shaving off beards,” he said, insisting on hiding his real name in case he offended the militants. “They are now thinking about bigger issues, because they have a lot of territory and resources.”
A decade after the fields and lanes outside Helmand’s capital were patrolled by thousands of British and American troops, the Taliban now rule almost unopposed. Afghan government forces, built up at great expense and effort by the Nato allies, melted away in early October in the face of a militant push on Lashkar Gah.
The Taliban in these districts was always a formidable foe for the government forces and their international backers, but they now have almost complete control.
“The government has no authority in our areas and the Taliban are not afraid of them,” explains Abdul Salaam, a farmer from Marjah. The consolidation of Taliban power in these villages and market towns has allowed its parallel government to come out of the shadows and take charge. While the insurgents’ envoys broach negotiations with the Afghan government on how the country should be run after American troops leave, in these districts of Helmand, they are already able to put their plans in place. Their rule has allowed residents a glimpse of whether the Taliban has changed since it imposed its severe and backward vision of Islamic governance on the nation in the Nineties.
Elders in these central Helmand districts told The Daily Telegraph that the militants appeared to have back-pedalled on some of their most draconian pronouncements and made an effort to be more approachable. Yet they still ruled by coercion and threats where it was deemed necessary, and many of their previous red lines for the population remained.
Residents of Marjah, Nad-e-ali and Garmsir said that the militants, once notorious for using beatings and public humiliation to enforce edicts banning music or decreeing men grow long beards, had stepped back from such unpopular rules. “Although the Taliban have not given formal permission to young people, they let them listen to music on their phones, cut their beards and hold gatherings with music,” said Abdul Salaam. They have also stepped up efforts to bring services demanded by locals.
Vows to provide better governance than the corrupt and predatory central government have always been at the heart of the Taliban’s insurgency. It no longer attacks schools and clinics as symbols of the government and instead now takes over government services in its area, allowing doctors and medics to continue their work as long as they abide by Taliban rules.
The shift has even seen it relax one of its most notorious restrictions from the Nineties, and allow girls to go to school. Girls can study up to their early teens, residents said, while government monitors can visit schools. However, the Taliban demands a say in who is employed and often tries to force its officials on to school payrolls. It has also tried to ban some books from the curriculum, locals said.
Justice remains one of the Taliban’s main selling points, residents said.
Robbers and criminals face harsh punishment. A system of courts, with two levels of appeal, brings quick and binding judgments on land disputes and disagreements and is at odds with the tortuous and corrupt government judiciary.
Criticism of the Taliban had been unheard of in the past, said Abdul Salaam. “No one could talk about their rights and no one could question their policies,” he recalled. Residents had now at times been able to stop some of the most onerous Taliban practices, such as the billeting of fighters on families, after complaining to leaders, he said.
A recent study of Taliban governance in Nad-e Ali, by the Afghanistan Analysts Network, found: “Although there are very few direct ways in which residents or elders can influence the Taliban in the district, let alone hold them to account, the Taliban do seem a little less intolerant – at least in some cases – to community concerns.”
Yet despite some signs of changes in Taliban policy, residents said that the militants’ religious and moral strictures remained severe. Accusations of immorality between men and women, or of neglecting prayers, remained a “serious red line to the Taliban”, said Abdul Salaam. “If the Taliban hear something, the person will see heavy punishment.”
Policy changes welcomed by conservative villagers in the Taliban heartlands are also unlikely to give much reassurance in Afghanistan’s cities. Even as the militants attempt to tell Helmandis that they are more tolerant and approachable, they are accused of waging an unrelenting assassination campaign in Kabul, targeting journalists, civil servants and members of civil society.
“The Taliban still think like villagers,” said one prominent Kabul businessman. “They have no idea how the country has evolved in the past two decades.”
‘They are much less serious about music, television and shaving off beards. They are thinking about bigger issues’