The Daily Telegraph

Experts urge fresh Wuhan inquiry

- By Sarah Newey Global Health security correspond­ent

SCIENTISTS have called for a new investigat­ion into the origins of the pandemic amid concerns Beijing exerted political influence over the World Health Organisati­on team leading a probe in China.

In an open letter, published yesterday, a group of 26 experts in areas including virology, zoology and microbiolo­gy claimed the WHO mission did not “constitute a thorough, credible and transparen­t investigat­ion”.

“We believe it essential that all hypotheses about the origins of the pandemic be thoroughly examined and full access to all necessary resources be provided without regard to political or other sensitivit­ies,” the letter added.

Earlier this year, the WHO team spent four weeks in Wuhan – where the first Covid-19 cases were detected in 2019 – to investigat­e how the virus emerged.

The scientists said that while “all hypotheses remain open”, it was highly unlikely that the virus had come from a laboratory. Instead, they maintained, Sars-cov-2 most likely jumped from bats to humans via an as-yet-unknown intermedia­ry host.

While most experts expected inconclusi­ve findings – establishi­ng the origin of diseases usually takes years, if not decades – the lack of a “smoking gun” has heightened geopolitic­al tension.

The Chinese government, which has called for similar Who-led missions to other countries, used the investigat­ion to push the theory that the virus spread to Wuhan via frozen food packaging.

Meanwhile, the United States has implied it will independen­tly verify the initial conclusion­s, and the UK has expressed concern that the team of internatio­nal scientists was not given full access to required data.

The investigat­ors were expected to publish a summary report within weeks of leaving China, but The Daily Telegraph understand­s that this has been pushed back.

Since the team left Wuhan, they and their counterpar­ts in China have been jointly editing and finalising a draft of a full report which looks set to be published alongside the summary in the next two to three weeks.

“The rationale is straightfo­rward – everything that would be in the summary report has already been discussed with the press and published in the media,” Dr Peter Daszak, an ecologist and member of the WHO team, told The Telegraph.

Those defending the internatio­nal mission say its aim was never to “investigat­e” and catch out China. Instead, it was to study and better understand the origins of the outbreak through “scientific and collaborat­ive field missions”.

But, in the open letter criticisin­g the trip, a group of experts from countries including France, the US and Australia criticised the mission’s scope.

“The joint Who-china team had neither the mandate, independen­ce nor the access necessary to conduct a full and unrestrict­ed investigat­ion,” said Etienne Decroly, a molecular virologist at Aix-marseille University in France and a signatory of the letter.

The WHO “had to rely on informatio­n the Chinese authoritie­s chose to share with them”, the letter adds.

But others have said a new inquiry is unlikely given the problems of entering China – the WHO mission was delayed after members had “visa issues”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom