The Daily Telegraph

Mixing vaccines ‘may give better long-term protection’

- By Henry Bodkin

MIXING vaccines could improve protection against coronaviru­s, a senior government scientific adviser has said.

Prof Anthony Harnden, deputy chairman of the Joint Committee on Vaccinatio­n and Immunisati­on, said different vaccine types could coalesce to boost the immune system and provide a longer-lasting response. He also said a “mix and match” approach could make future rollouts more flexible.

It comes after planners were forced to rethink phase 2 of the rollout, which started on Tuesday, after the JCVI recommende­d people aged 18 to 29 have an alternativ­e to the Astrazenec­a jab due to blood clotting concerns. Currently only two other vaccines – Pfizer and Moderna – have received regulatory approval in the UK.

The promise of 30million one-jab Johnson & Johnson doses in the summer suffered a setback this week after US regulators suspended its use, also due to fears over clotting.

Prof Harnden said: “If we can mix and match, we’ll get much better flexibilit­y – we will be able to potentiall­y use different vaccine booster campaigns in the autumn. And, in fact, mixed schedules may – and this is a big may – but they may give better longer-term protection, and that will be very interestin­g to see.”

His comments followed the announceme­nt of a new trial to test the effect of mixing vaccines. Led by Oxford University, the Com-cov2 study will assess the immune response of people who have had two of the Pfizer, Astrazenec­a, Moderna and Novovax jabs. While the Government has said that people should get two jabs of the same vaccine in the current rollout, a finding that mixing is beneficial, or at least not inferior, could greatly improve the flexibilit­y of a third “booster” jab rollout, which could take place in the autumn.

Asked about the pausing of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine in the US, Prof Harnden said that regulators examined the safety data “almost on a daily basis”.

He told Good Morning Britain: “It is of concern, and we will keep a very close review of the situation.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom