The Daily Telegraph

Tech giants face racism crackdown

- By Charles Hymas HOME AFFAIRS EDITOR

SOCIAL media giants that fail to crackdown on racism will face multimilli­onpound fines under new duty-of-care laws to be unveiled next month.

On the eve of football’s weekend boycott of social media over abuse, The Daily Telegraph can disclose that racism will for the first time be proscribed in law as an Ofcom-regulated online harm.

Firms repeatedly failing to take down racist posts and tackle perpetrato­rs face fines of up to 10 per cent of their global turnover or £18million, whichever is higher. The online harms Bill, to be unveiled in the Queen’s Speech next month, will define racism as a statutory online harm alongside anti-semitism and the promotion of suicide or self-harm.

From 3pm today English Football goes silent on social media until 11.59pm on Monday in protest at the failure of the tech platforms to prevent abuse. Organisati­ons including the Football Associatio­n, Premier League and EFL, will suspend their accounts, joined by bodies representi­ng rugby, cricket, tennis, cycling, darts and sports broadcaste­rs.

Writing in The Daily Telegraph, Steve Hatch, a senior Facebook executive, says it has “clear rules” against hate speech but cannot stop people being prejudiced. “Zero tolerance doesn’t mean zero incidence,” he writes. “We can’t stop people from being prejudiced, or from typing abuse.”

Ofcom will also get powers to protect free speech by stopping “woke” social media firms removing controvers­ial comments by politician­s or Right-wing commentato­rs. It will be able to intervene to protect “freedom of expression” and “content of democratic importance”. It follows Youtube’s removal of Julia Hartley-brewer’s lockdown comments and Twitter’s decision to close Donald Trump’s account.

Social media has become part of the fabric of football fan culture, from helping fans go behind the scenes, to connecting with others after a win. They’re exactly the kind of positive connection­s we want to see on Facebook and Instagram. Yet some people will still try to abuse others on social media, just as they do offline. We’ve seen that all too often, with the recent and abhorrent racist and sexist abuse targeted at athletes, presenters and others online. No one should have to experience that.

We share the goal of those pausing their accounts this weekend and understand people want to drive change. While this issue is bigger than one company, we want to help stop online hate and know we have a big role to play in protecting people from abuse. We want to take this moment to explain what we’re doing to achieve that goal, and discuss the changes some are calling for.

We have clear rules against hate speech. Unfortunat­ely, zero tolerance doesn’t mean zero incidence. We can’t stop people from being prejudiced, or from typing abuse into their phone, but we can take steps to strengthen our rules, and improve our detection and enforcemen­t. Over the past few years we’ve built tools to protect people from abuse, including the ability to filter it from comments on posts and turn off Instagram Direct Messages (DMS) from people they don’t follow.

Like text messages, DMS are private conversati­ons where messages go to you personally. That means we rely on in-app reports and don’t proactivel­y look for hate speech or bullying in DMS the same way that we do in comments or posts. And yet we know DMS are where many public figures have received horrific abuse. That’s why over the past few months we’ve taken tougher action when people break our rules in DMS, by removing the accounts of those who repeatedly send violating messages. And from next week, we’ll start rolling out a new tool which, when turned on, will automatica­lly filter DM requests containing offensive words, phrases and emojis.

This is the first feature of its kind across social media. We’ve shaped it after consulting with footballer­s and anti-discrimina­tion experts. If people use it, they should not see these types of abusive messages from strangers. It puts control back in the hands of the targets of abuse, and we encourage everyone to turn it on when it’s available. We’ll also start making it harder for someone you’ve blocked to contact you again, by letting you pre-emptively block new accounts they may create.

The work to bring about real long-term change must happen offline, too. That’s why we teamed up with Kick It Out to launch anti-discrimina­tion initiative, Take a Stand, empowering fans to call out discrimina­tion and racism wherever they see it, moving the conversati­on from awareness to action. And we’re working with Hope Not Hate to pilot anti-discrimina­tion education programmes for fans.

Some are calling for people to hand over personal ID to social media firms before they set up an account. We understand people want to hold abusers accountabl­e – so do we. That’s why we continue to work with the police on hate speech, and respond to valid legal requests for informatio­n, which can be essential for investigat­ions. But asking for us to also require ID for everyone who sets up an account brings real, albeit unintended, risks. Estimates suggest there are 3.5million people – mainly from disadvanta­ged groups – in the UK who don’t have access to official forms of photo ID. That said, we’re continuing to research identity-based problems and solutions, while accounting for the very real challenges of exclusion, privacy and security.

People also ask whether we prioritise copyright violations over hate speech. We don’t. Both are against our rules, but in some cases, our automated systems can be more effective in catching and removing copyright violations. Hate speech almost always needs a human reviewer to understand the context; for example, if it is being used to attack, we’d remove it, but if someone is condemning it, we’d allow it. It’s not a like-for-like comparison, and certainly not an indication of which we take more seriously.

No single thing will fix this challenge overnight but we’re committed to doing what we can to keep our community safe from abuse. We’ll continue our work with the football industry, government and others to effect change through action and education. Together we will keep up the fight to make sure everyone can connect in an environmen­t that’s free from abuse.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom