The Daily Telegraph

Robinson: Today show is not perfect, but we try our best

- By Anita Singh ARTS AND ENTERTAINM­ENT EDITOR

NICK ROBINSON has defended Radio 4’s Today against criticism from Lord Howard, saying its presenters “don’t always get it right but we do our best”.

Lord Howard wrote in The Daily Telegraph yesterday that he would no longer listen to the programme because it was so politicall­y biased.

The “final straw” for him was Mr Robinson’s interview with Nadhim Zahawi, the vaccine minister, this week. He pressed Mr Zahawi on details of the Government’s proposals for the reform of social care, which the minister could not disclose before they had been announced to Parliament.

He “spent the whole interview berating the minister for not doing what Mr Robinson knew full well he couldn’t do”, Lord Howard said, claiming he “has assumed the role of the Today programme’s main rottweiler, a role previously filled with far more grace and objectivit­y by John Humphrys”.

Mr Robinson responds with a letter in today’s Telegraph. “I’m sorry to read that Michael Howard is turning off his radio,” he writes, saying that this week’s programme has featured some “illuminati­ng and civilised conversati­ons”.

“The joy of live radio is that it can move us – bringing joy when we hear of Emma Raducanu’s success; tears when we hear the memories of those still haunted by 9/11 and, yes, sometimes anger when we shout at the radio at a politician who is being evasive or an interviewe­r who interrupts too much.

“We presenters don’t always get it right but we do our best to balance allowing those we interview to get their message across and holding them to account.”

In his piece, Lord Howard said he had previously adopted the “unpopular attitude

‘We do our best to balance allowing those we interview to get their message across and holding them to account’

among Conservati­ves” of defending the BBC “despite its pronounced and well documented bias”.

However, he said, his patience had worn thin. “The Today programme, in particular, has completely crossed the boundary from which it could previously have been regarded as a plausibly authoritat­ive, if biased, guide to the national discourse to a place where it seems to have given up all pretence to an objective point of view,” he said.

sir – I’m sorry that Michael Howard is turning off his radio (Comment, September 10). He will have missed some illuminati­ng and civilised conversati­ons this week on Today

– with the head of MI5 and Tony Blair examining the fallout from 9/11; the Archbishop of Canterbury on climate change and the Health Secretary on the crises in the NHS and social care.

The joy of live radio is that it can move us – bringing joy when we hear of Emma Raducanu’s success; tears when we hear the memories of those haunted by 9/11 and, yes, sometimes anger when we shout at the radio at a politician who is being evasive or an interviewe­r who interrupts too much.

We presenters don’t always get it right but we do our best to balance allowing those we interview to get their message across and holding them to account.

I hope Lord Howard will be back listening soon and, perhaps, back in the studio too, where he has always robustly answered, rather than ignored, challengin­g questions.

Nick Robinson

London W1

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom