The Daily Telegraph

The great art of debating is being crushed by the woke onslaught

- Ruth dudley edwards follow Ruth Dudley Edwards on Twitter @Ruthde; read more at

They seek to suck all the joy out of life, these new puritans. Consider the Lib Dem response to the airing on Monday of a few old (1987 and 1993) tapes of Michael Gove making deliberate­ly outrageous remarks at the Oxford and Cambridge Unions to shock and amuse. He should, said Lib Dem whip Wendy Chamberlai­n, “be ashamed that he ever thought these things, let alone said them. These inappropri­ate and racist remarks are not befitting of a government minister, nor befitting of a journalist – in fact, not befitting of anyone.”

She reminds me of the Roman Catholic bishops of my Dublin childhood, warning their congregati­ons against impure thoughts. These days, I think, what bishops – and, indeed, Lib Dem whips – should be saying is that seeking to destroy people’s careers by subjecting every word they uttered in the past to the scrutiny of a censorious later generation destroys trust and spontaneit­y, eradicates humour from public life, enforces conformity and is one of the greatest evils of our time.

Gove is a lot funnier than he used to be, and some of his remarks were crass and unrepeatab­le. But he had the excuse of being young at a glorious time when people were free to speak without fear – and, crucially, he did so within the great traditions of the university debating societies, where what you said was not necessaril­y what you believed, but was intended to entertain, provoke and win arguments.

My 1960s student life in University College Dublin was made magical by Saturday nights at the Literary and Historical Debating Society (L&H), founded by Cardinal Newman in 1855, which to us represente­d freedom from the censorious outside world. It was where we gathered to applaud and boo the orators, particular­ly the iconoclast­s, mavericks and wits and, through the clash of debate and argument, to tease each other out of a conservati­ve and religious society’s straitjack­et. Few women spoke – mainly because there was no tradition of debating in girls’ schools and the L&H was a bear pit peopled by brilliant, merciless hecklers – but it was none the less also our club, and when I attend its reunions we talk of a period of joy when we egged each other on to question and make fun of everything.

We relied on modest membership fees and had none of the trappings of our Oxford, Cambridge and Trinity College Dublin equivalent­s but, particular­ly because of its anarchic edge, the L&H often carried off debating trophies like the Observer Mace. I haven’t been back to speak there for some time, but from what I hear it has been struck by the contagion of the wokery that I found at the Oxford Union, where I recently made one of the worst speeches of my life. Foolishly, I was expecting debate, but the norm was prepared speeches of almost total uniformity of opinion.

Still, I’m delighted that there are still young people who want to be part of a debating society at all, and as an inveterate optimist I believe that students will once again discover the pleasure of playing with ideas, rebelling against fashionabl­e opinion and offending each other just for the hell of it.

Wendy Chamberlai­n said that the Prime Minister “should consider whether this is the type of person that deserves to be sat around the Cabinet table. However, given Boris Johnson’s own history of disgracefu­l remarks, I expect this will be another shameful issue he lets go unchalleng­ed.” I certainly hope so.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom