The Daily Telegraph

Meet the ‘homeless billionair­es’ club...

Elon Musk is the latest super-high net worth celebrity to shed his possession­s – including his homes,

- says Guy Kelly

It’s generally considered foolish to take Elon Musk’s tweets as gospel. His followers know this, his critics know this, Tesla’s shareholde­rs know this, and the jury at his defamation trial two years ago definitely knows this (he was found not liable after being sued by a British cave expert he had called a “pedo guy”).

So when, on May 1 last year, Musk broadcast the following to his 60million Twitter followers, nobody really expected him to stay true to his word: “I am selling almost all physical possession­s. Will own no house.”

Ah, there goes Elon, we thought. At the time, Musk, the second wealthiest man in history, owned at least six houses in California alone, had a property portfolio worth $100million (£73million), and as well as real estate, presumably had a few other “physical possession­s”.

Yet 15 months on, he’s put his ever-increasing money where his mouth is. Slowly but surely, all but one (a 16,000 sq ft mansion south of San Francisco he still uses for events) of those California properties has sold.

One was Gene Wilder’s former home, which Musk had never lived in but had reportedly used as a superexclu­sive private school code-named “Adastra” for his children and those of Tesla and Spacex high-ups. He had stipulated that the place “cannot be torn down or lose any [of ] its soul”, and has since sold it to Wilder’s nephew, Jordan Walker-pearlman, and his wife. Records suggest he made no profit, and actually lent the couple $6.7 million to buy it.

Today, Musk, 50, owns no home of his own. Instead, he’s living in a small prefab, rented from Spacex, in Texas. It is 375 sq ft and cost $50,000. “It’s kinda awesome though,” said the man who, between April 2020 and April 2021, made $383 million per day on average.

The decision means Musk – who is now girlfriend­less as well, having recently “semi-separated” from the musician Grimes – has joined a rare group of super-high net worth individual­s far more comfortabl­e accruing money or giving it away than living a typical billionair­e’s lifestyle.

“In some ways, possession­s weigh you down,” Musk said last year, when asked about his status as a “homeless billionair­e”. “And also, I just have all these houses but nobody is using them.”

Grimes – with whom he has an 18-month-old son, X AE A-xii, known as “X” (he also has six other children) – reportedly wanted him to keep hold of at least one home, but he wasn’t keen on rattling around a cavernous mansion just because he could.

“I have been staying in this strange Gatsby-like house, what I call the haunted mansion, and it’s a bit bleak, to be totally frank,” he said. “The house itself is beautiful but, you know, it’s like Wayne Manor without Alfred.”

The sense of futility Musk expresses at owning so much is familiar to other billionair­es who’ve let go of it all.

Perhaps the most famous member of the “homeless billionair­es” club is Nicolas Berggruen, the Paris-born investor who turned his $250,000 trust fund into a fortune of more than $2 billion through buying property and stakes in companies such as Karstadt, the German retailing group, and Prisa, the Spanish media conglomera­te. As Berggruen accrued that wealth in the 1980s and 90s, he also furnished his life with the usual trappings: flashy cars, massive houses, priceless art.

Then, in 2000, he grew tired of it all, and decided to unload. The art went to museums, the cars were returned, the houses sold. Berggruen gave up his possession­s, save for a few essentials such as his Gulfstream IV private jet.

“If you have things and if you are a perfection­ist, which I am, you have to really tend to them, and it takes energy away from other things,” Berggruen said, employing the same logic Mark Zuckerberg uses to validate wearing the same outfit every day. “I understand the human instinct to want to create a nest and possess things, to show them off. But for me personally, it became less and less interestin­g.”

Being a man means “you don’t need as much”, he said in an interview in 2012, conducted at the five-star Carlyle Hotel in New York, where he was staying at the time. “I have very few possession­s… a few papers, a couple of books, and a few shirts, jackets, sweaters. It fits in a little thing, in a paper bag, so it’s very easy.”

Living in hotels is practicall­y a cliché when it comes to the loneliness of wealth: Robert De Niro at the Chateau Marmont, Salvador Dalí at the Meurice, Dylan Thomas at the Chelsea Hotel, Coco Chanel at The Ritz.

Five years ago, Berggruen, now 60, had two children using an egg donor and two separate surrogates, so put expensive roots down in Los Angeles.

First came a sprawling 1920s mansion above the Sunset Strip, then a $41 million estate once owned by Louis B Mayer’s daughter, then the estate next door, and, earlier this month, $63.1 million for William Randolph Hearst’s estate in Beverly Hills – thought to be the highest price ever paid for a house at auction. It was in The Godfather, The Bodyguard, and is rumoured to have been JFK and Jackie’s honeymoon spot.

Berggruen’s about-turn might be a harbinger for Musk: eventually the lure of a property portfolio, and the ease with which you can have one, becomes too much. After all, even notoriousl­y generous billionair­es like US business magnate Warren Buffett – who set up The Giving Pledge with Bill and Melinda Gates in 2010 to encourage wealthy people to give the majority of their money to charity – possess homes, even if, in Buffett’s case, it’s a bog-standard five-bed in Omaha he paid $31,500 for in 1958.

“How would I improve my life by having 10 houses around the globe? I don’t want to manage 10 houses and I don’t want somebody else doing it for me and I don’t know why the hell I’d be happier,” Buffett told the BBC.

Whether Musk is being charitable or simply plunging every last penny into his Mars missions isn’t fully clear, but if it’s the former, there is at least one role model left. Buffett’s friend and fellow philanthro­pist, Chuck Feeney, also pledged to rid himself of his wealth and possession­s – and he’s almost done it. The co-founder of retail giant Duty Free Shoppers, Feeney has spent the last four decades donating $8 billion to charities, universiti­es and foundation­s, and seems intent on dying broke. Today, aged 90, he has no car or luxuries, wears a plastic $15 watch and lives with his wife, Helga, in a small rented San Francisco apartment that “has the austerity of a freshman dorm room.”

Feeney, the true “homeless billionair­e”, has often been asked why he did it, when so few others feel the same urge. He always has the same reply: “It was the right thing to do.” Your move, Elon.

‘Possession­s weigh you down... and I have all these houses but nobody is using them’

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Last one standing: a 16,000 sq ft mansion is the only California­n property Musk has not sold
Last one standing: a 16,000 sq ft mansion is the only California­n property Musk has not sold
 ?? ?? Burdened by wealth? Billionair­es Nicolas Berggruen, Elon Musk and Warren Buffett
Burdened by wealth? Billionair­es Nicolas Berggruen, Elon Musk and Warren Buffett
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom