The Daily Telegraph

Alberto Vilar

Financier who became opera’s most generous benefactor but ended his career in jail for fraud

- Alberto Vilar, born October 4 1940, died September 4 2021

ALBERTO VILAR, who has died aged 80, became a hero in arts circles around the turn of the century as the opera world’s most generous benefactor – until 2005, when he was arrested and charged on several counts of fraud.

Vilar, a Cuban-american financier, had made his fortune in technology stocks, buying shares in companies such as Microsoft, AOL, Amazon and Yahoo from a time when they were almost unheard of. In 2002 he was valued by Forbes magazine at

$950 million, and his generosity saw his name engraved into the marble of leading arts institutio­ns around the world.

The sums involved were staggering. His donations and pledges included $45 million to the New York Metropolit­an Opera (where the grand tier was named in his honour),

$50 million to the Kennedy Arts Center in Washington and $14 million to the Los Angeles Opera. In Milan a grateful La Scala awarded him the title of “First Benefactor”. Even the stuffier citadels of Teutonic culture – Bayreuth, Vienna, Salzburg – accepted Vilar largesse.

In Britain beneficiar­ies included, most notably, Covent Garden, where his pledge of £10 million was said to have saved the Royal Opera House at a time when its developmen­t appeal was short of its target. In 1999 the grateful beneficiar­ies named their shiny new glass atrium the Vilar Floral Hall.

Opera-lovers around the world also had cause to thank Vilar for the support he gave to the Kirov Opera under its conductor and director Valery Gergiev, for the seat-back surtitles in major houses and young singers’ programmes that he financed.

Estimates of Vilar’s largesse varied, but in 2001 he told The Daily Telegraph that he could give away $50 million a year without feeling the pinch. “Without Alberto,” wrote Norman Lebrecht in the Evening Standard in 2005, “there would be no Covent Garden, no Kirov, no future.”

His rewards included his own front seats at the Met (A101-2) and Covent Garden (A8-9), full recognitio­n in opera programmes and the respect he considered his due (he could be touchy if he felt it was lacking).

Vilar always made it clear that he would finance only specific projects and some in the opera world accused him of micromanag­ement, favouring the traditiona­l and safe over the experiment­al and radical, but most people saw him as a saviour. “I say to the people who criticise him: don’t try to be too protective of opera – all that money could go elsewhere,” said Valery Gergiev.

And so things might have continued more or less happily were it not for the bursting of the dot-com bubble.

Vilar’s pledges were usually paid out in instalment­s, and in early 2002 reports began trickling in that payments were falling behind. As promised cheques failed to materialis­e, opera houses began cancelling production­s and quietly removing Vilar’s name from programmes. Those inclined to give Vilar the benefit of the doubt included Tony Hall at Covent Garden, who insisted that his name should remain on the Floral Hall, only removing it in 2005 after Vilar was charged in the US with stealing money from a client, by which time the opera house had reportedly received only £4.4 million of his promised £10 million.

Vilar had been arrested in May that year and charged with defrauding an unnamed investor of $5 million in order to make good on some of his pledges, and to pay expenses for his investment firm Amerindo.

Given that his personal wealth had recently been estimated at

$950 million and Amerindo’s auditors had reported $1.2 billion in assets in July 2001, it seemed unlikely that he had found himself short of $5 million, and he denied all charges.

However, when the judge set bail at $10 million, Vilar’s lawyer revealed that he had less than $10,000 in the bank.

The response did not show the arts world in a good light as most of Vilar’s fair-weather friends turned their back on him and refused to stump up towards his bail. Eventually the bond was secured by property and works of art from Vilar’s collection – and $500,000 from Valery Gergiev.

In 2010 Vilar and his business partner Gary Tanaka were found guilty of a scheme to steal $20 million from clients. Vilar was convicted on 12 counts, including money laundering, wire fraud and lying to the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Most profiles in the British press claimed that Vilar was born in Cuba, where his father was a sugar magnate, but spent much of his childhood in Puerto Rico, where the family also owned large plantation­s. After the Cuban revolution, the story went, the Vilars moved to the US.

In fact he was born on October 4 1940 in East Orange, New Jersey, the son of Albert and Margaret Vilar; he was christened Albert William – the “o” was added later. There was much truth in his story, however. His father was a sugar magnate who took his family on business to Cuba and lost out when his interests there were nationalis­ed. By the age of nine his parents were divorced and young Albert was living with his father and grandparen­ts in Puerto Rico.

He read Economics at Washington & Jefferson College, Pennsylvan­ia, and took a Master’s degree at Iona College in New Rochelle, New York. He found his way to Wall Street, where a presentati­on about semiconduc­tors in the mid-1970s convinced him that the future lay in technology stocks. In 1979, along with Gary Tanaka, he founded Amerindo Investment Advisors, a firm based in San Francisco and New York, with offices in London.

Their high-risk strategy brought some astonishin­g rewards, particular­ly in the dot-com boom of the late 1990s, when Vilar declared the internet to be “bigger than the Industrial Revolution”. In 1998, the Amerindo Technology Fund gained 85 per cent and the following year it posted a 249 per cent gain. Investors included the World Bank and the New York City Employees’ Retirement System.

Vilar had fallen in love with opera when he went to the Met in the 1960s to see Lucia di Lammermoor, with Joan Sutherland in the title role. But by his own account his philanthro­py had begun in childhood. “I was brought up Christian,” he told the Sunday Times in 2000, “and you are supposed to put 10 per cent of your income into the collection bucket. Since I was a little kid I got enormous satisfacti­on from giving money away for causes. ”

Vilar did not confine his generosity to art. He gave $12 million to a New York hospital where he had been treated after fracturing his arm in a skiing accident, and $20 million to Columbia University to attract foreign students.

As technology stocks crashed, the value of Amerindo’s technology fund nosedived. Vilar struggled on for a time, continuing to support his favourite causes, but then his world fell apart.

In February 2010 he was jailed for nine years. He was eventually freed in 2018, having had a year added to his sentence for preventing victims’ families from recovering their money.

Vilar was twice married, both marriages ending in divorce. In 2001 he became engaged to Karen Painter, a musicologi­st 24 years his junior. The wedding was fixed for October 2002, only to be “suspended” at a week’s notice. He had no children.

After his release, Vilar maintained that he had been punished for a crime in which no one lost anything – because investors were eventually repaid, with interest. Last year he was reported to be living on the dole and sleeping on a couch in a shared apartment.

And indeed his story did have elements of operatic tragedy.

 ?? ?? Vilar in New York in 1999: he made his money in technology stocks and gave much of it away, but his world came crashing down after the dot-com bubble burst
Vilar in New York in 1999: he made his money in technology stocks and gave much of it away, but his world came crashing down after the dot-com bubble burst

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom