The Daily Telegraph

‘Soft touch’ justice blamed for one in 1,000 conviction rate for illegal entry to the UK

- By Charles Hymas HOME AFFAIRS EDITOR

THE Crown Prosecutio­n Service (CPS) is failing to prosecute migrants who arrive in the UK illegally, figures show, as MPS warned “soft touch” justice was encouragin­g people to get on small boats to cross the Channel.

Only 61 migrants have been charged and 51 convicted for illegally entering the UK “without leave” in breach of the 1971 Immigratio­n Act since December 2019, according to official figures obtained under Freedom of Informatio­n laws.

That compares with more than 46,000 who entered the UK illegally over the same period, including 16,500 “irregular” entrants confirmed by the Home Office in 2020 and nearly 30,000 via small boats across the Channel or smuggled into the UK on lorries. The figures – representi­ng a conviction rate of only one in 1,000 – expose the “hands off” approach to Channel migrants adopted by the CPS.

This summer the CPS revealed that it would no longer prosecute asylum seekers entering the UK illegally unless they were involved in other criminal activity. The CPS advised its prosecutor­s that the migrants often had no choice in how they travelled and told them instead to focus on smugglers and repeat offenders.

However, Tory MPS and migration campaigner­s said the decision was removing a key deterrent to the deadly cross-channel trade, which this week claimed the lives of 27 migrants and left the door open to people smugglers who could make as much as £300,000 from a single boat.

The offence of illegally entering the UK carries a penalty of up to six months in jail, which the Government is increasing to four years under its Nationalit­y and Borders Bill. Penalties for people smugglers are being raised from a maximum 14 years’ jail to life imprisonme­nt.

Alp Mehmet, the chairman of Migration Watch UK, said: “Despite the public safety risks, the Government seems to have turned a blind eye to thousands of illegal arrivals even as numbers soared. This is both shocking and unacceptab­le to the voters who are paying for this shambles.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom