The Daily Telegraph

Dutch slave descendant­s offered thousands to help change names

- By Senay Boztas in Amsterdam

THE Dutch city of Utrecht has offered to refund costs of several thousands of euros each to descendant­s of enslaved people who want to change colonial-era surnames imposed on them by former owners on plantation­s.

Yesterday, it became the third Dutch city, after Amsterdam and Rotterdam, to offer an apology for its role in profiting from slavery.

Sharon Dijksma, Utrecht’s mayor, pledged an unlimited amount in compensati­on for the costs involved in the complicate­d process of name changing.

In America and Asia, the descendant­s of more than a million people enslaved by the Dutch were forced to take new surnames. These were not allowed to be too typically Dutch, and were judged by a committee based on Napoleonic law.

For example, the surname Vriesde reflected that of the slave “owner” De Vries, while Madretsma was Amsterdam spelt backwards.

Some people were named after plantation­s, while others were given Dutch-sounding nonsense names such as Berghout, Lepelblad and Wijntak.

Under Dutch law, changing a surname is “bureaucrat­ic, time-consuming and expensive”, according to Ms Dijksma. It requires a court case to convince the justice ministry that the name is an “impediment” to daily life.

The cost for the process can reach several thousand euros – at least €835 (£700) plus legal fees and the price of a “psychologi­cal investigat­ion” to prove the name is causing harm. If the request is denied, the money is not refunded.

Last year, Utrecht city council voted to make it easier for Dutch people to change their surnames if they had a link with slavery in the past. But Ms Dijksma believes that covering the costs involved is a crucial extra step towards addressing the wrongs of the past and combating racial discrimina­tion.

“This needs to happen on a national level, too,” she said.

It is not known how many people are believed to be eligible for the compensati­on; however, experts say the number is less important than the symbolism.

Linda Nooitmeer, chairman of Ninsee, the national slavery and heritage institute, said: “During slavery, people had a lot taken away: their names, rituals, language, religion, identity, everything that made them human.

“It is very important that descendant­s who want to change their names, who want to invent themselves again, have that possibilit­y.”

Ms Dijksma also said she believed it was “important” to apologise for the city’s role in slavery, “not as an empty gesture but to look to the future”.

The Netherland­s has so far refused to take a similar step in acknowledg­ement of its national history as a major slave trader.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom