The Daily Telegraph

Property deals are the riskiest investment­s right now

Buyers and sellers refuse to face up to stark reality, lulling the market into a false sense of security

- TOM STEVENSON Tom Stevenson is an investment director at Fidelity Internatio­nal. The views are his own

Financial markets and the real economy march to a different beat. The stock market fell rapidly between January and June this year as inflation and rising interest rates moved front of mind, but there had been straws in the wind for months prior to that. The multiple of earnings that investors were prepared to pay for shares had been drifting since the spring of 2021.

Markets are discountin­g mechanisms. They are not really interested in what is happening today, preferring to focus on what they think will happen tomorrow. That’s why shares were getting cheaper for nearly a year before the penny dropped that the Federal Reserve was serious about fighting inflation. As James Goldsmith put it: “By the time you see a bandwagon, it’s too late.”

John Maynard Keynes, the economist, used to think of stock market investing in terms of a newspaper beauty contest game. To play, contestant­s had to pick six faces out of a hundred. The winner was the one who identified the six most popular choices. It was an upsidedown version of the TV game show Pointless. The naive strategy for a player of Keynes’s game was to pick the six faces they thought most attractive. More sophistica­ted players would think about the features that most people would be drawn to. The canniest contestant­s would try to anticipate “what average opinion expects the average opinion to be” as Keynes wrote in his General Theory.

Keynes thought that stock markets worked in the same way, with successful investors not simply identifyin­g the investment­s that were fundamenta­lly attractive but the ones that they thought most other investors considered good value. Or indeed that most investors thought that most other investors would like. And so on.

This approach works when it comes to which investment­s to buy, but it is also relevant when deciding when to buy them. A year ago, it was not just a matter of anticipati­ng the Fed’s tightening cycle but also worrying about higher interest rates before other investors got there.

More recently, investors have jumped even further ahead and started to think about what happens once the Fed stops hiking and starts restimulat­ing a slowing economy sometime next year. This is why market timing is so difficult and why it is easy to be just a little bit behind the curve when it comes to market turning points. You have to think several moves ahead to stand a chance.

Actually, the challenge facing investors is even more complicate­d than this because it’s not just the lag between markets and the economy that matters. Also important is the variable linkage between different asset classes and what’s happening in the real world.

Shares are typically the first to move. Investors know that when it comes to earnings, the announceme­nt of results is the end of the process. Share prices have factored in higher or lower profits long before earnings season arrives. Indeed, poor results can sometimes trigger a share price rally, if they are not quite as bad as feared.

Government bonds are also quick to pick up on changes in the macro environmen­t. The yield on US Treasury bonds, for example, was above 3pc long before interest rates had got close to that level.

But now that interest rates are catching up with bonds, yields are heading the other way in anticipati­on of next year’s likely recession. The moment to lock in 3.5pc on a 10-year Treasury was fleetingly brief.

Corporate bonds lag behind government debt because, even as interest rates and Treasury yields are rising in response to rising inflation, investors may still be keen to buy corporate bonds against a buoyant economic backdrop.

It’s only later, when the threat of recession feels more real, that investors start to demand more compensati­on for the higher risks of lending to companies than government­s. That process has now begun and the gap between government and corporate bond yields is widening.

Next in line are late cycle assets like commoditie­s. At the beginning of this year energy and industrial metals prices were riding high. And, as I pointed out last week, the long-term case for natural resources remains strong. But the cycle is now against the likes of copper, down 15pc year to date, as investors worry that short-term demand will fall as the economy slows.

The riskiest parts of the market at the moment, the next shoe to drop, feel like the illiquid assets where prices may not move until after the changes have shown up in the real economy.

Commercial property is the most obvious case in point. A lack of buyers, and sellers refusing to face up to reality, mean there are not enough actual deals to validate today’s valuations. Property prices appear to be holding up but if you really want to see what’s going on, look at the quoted market for real estate investment trusts (REITS). Prices have fallen to yawning discounts to stated net asset value, which tells you all you need to know about what’s likely to happen next in the physical market.

The same absence of transactio­ns means private equity markets may be the last to price in changing conditions. An unwillingn­ess to raise money or come to market at depressed values can leave investors with a false sense of security about the real value of their unquoted investment­s.

And then it all begins again. Just as equity and bond investors were the first to pull the plug, it will be stock and Treasury markets that regain their mojo first. You may have missed one bandwagon, but another will be along very shortly.

 ?? Telegraph.co.uk/ ei-newsletter ?? Economic Intelligen­ce For unique insight into the world’s economic issues, sign up to our Economic Intelligen­ce newsletter, by Ambrose Evans-pritchard and Jeremy Warner
Telegraph.co.uk/ ei-newsletter Economic Intelligen­ce For unique insight into the world’s economic issues, sign up to our Economic Intelligen­ce newsletter, by Ambrose Evans-pritchard and Jeremy Warner
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom