The Daily Telegraph

Islamist terrorists refusing to take part in jail programmes

Inmates held in special ‘separation’ units are snubbing deradicali­sation schemes, inspector finds

- By Charles Hymas HOME AFFAIRS EDITOR

BRITAIN’S most dangerous convicted Islamist terrorists are boycotting prison work, education, training and deradicali­sation programmes that could rehabilita­te them, a watchdog has revealed.

An investigat­ion by Charlie Taylor, HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, found almost all the Islamist terrorists being held in special high-security “separation” units were “refusing to take part” in any purposeful activity or work to change their beliefs or behaviour.

The nine currently being held at the two high security jails HMP Frankland in Durham and HMP Woodhill in Buckingham­shire are regarded as the highest risk prisoners and are held in separation units because of fears they could radicalise other prisoners.

They are believed to include Hashem Abedi, who helped organise the 2017 Manchester Arena attack, and at least one Islamic State fighter.

Mr Taylor’s report comes just months after a terrorism watchdog warned that prison staff were so concerned about being accused of racism that Muslim terrorists had been able to seize control of wings and set up sharia courts behind bars.

The investigat­ion by Jonathan Hall, the independen­t reviewer of terrorist legislatio­n, said that Islamist extremists had sought to dictate diets and washing habits of non-muslim prisoners, and had gone unchalleng­ed when they insisted warders should be barred from attending Friday prayers.

As a result, Dominic Raab, the Justice Secretary, announced a significan­t expansion in the use of separation centres to protect the rest of the prison population from the most dangerousl­y ideologica­l inmates to stop jails becoming breeding grounds for terrorism.

Mr Taylor’s report shows that the Islamic terrorists currently held in such separation units are resisting the regime or any attempt to rehabilita­te them as they feel they are victims of discrimina­tion by being consigned to them.

“Almost all prisoners refused to take part in purposeful activity, complete offending behaviour work or engage with others such as imams and psychologi­sts,” said the report.

This meant they had very limited “day-to-day interactio­ns” with staff and could be cooped up in their cells for as long as 22 hours a day because of their refusal to participat­e in work, training or education. This also fuelled a “lack of trust” in staff, “which further impeded interactio­ns”.

Most refused to take part in “formal risk reduction work” which meant prison staff had little idea whether they were changing their behaviour.

The terrorists had the opportunit­y to take part in two deradicali­sation programmes, but “given their well-establishe­d religious and political beliefs and the potential peer pressure from their fellows, this was too big a step for most prisoners”, said Mr Taylor.

“The expectatio­n that men should address their offending behaviour by completing a formal interventi­on aimed at deradicali­sing their beliefs was proving unrealisti­c,” added the report.

The report said staff were “over-optimistic” about how far the terrorists would engage in deradicali­sation.

Fifteen men had been held in the three separation centres since they were opened in 2017. The third, at Full Sutton high security jail, is currently empty.

The report revealed that there had been one serious violent incident in October 2019 when a prison worker was injured. In anther case, three men had to be restrained after refusing to leave a kitchen.

Inspectors said they were concerned at “severe shortages” of staff at Woodhill, which was also criticised for failing to spend enough money on collecting intelligen­ce including monitoring telephone calls.

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: “Our separation centres are proving effective in preventing the most dangerous radicalise­rs from spreading their poisonous ideologies.

“We are going even further and have outlined tough new plans to separate more radical extremists from day one in custody, as well as investing a further £6million to separate the most violent – neutralisi­ng their influence and stopping hatred in its tracks.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom