The Daily Telegraph

Kuenssberg rejects Maitlis claims of ‘Tory cronyism’ at the BBC

- By Janet Eastham

‘I’ve never been told what to say – or what not to say, maybe more importantl­y’

LAURA KUENSSBERG has dismissed the idea BBC journalist­s are “restricted” in their work as she became the latest broadcaste­r to speak out in the wake of allegation­s that “Tory cronyism” is at the heart of the corporatio­n.

The BBC’S former political editor insisted she has “never been told what to say” by executives following accusation­s the broadcaste­r has been undermined by “an active Tory party agent”.

Speaking to The Sunday Times, Kuenssberg, who will host the BBC’S new flagship Sunday morning political programme, said that “it’s totally upside down” to suggest BBC journalist­s are “terribly restricted”. It’s not about “following the line” she said, but simply “trying to find the truth”.

Her comments appear to contradict remarks made by former Newsnight presenter Emily Maitlis last week in her Mactaggart Lecture at the Edinburgh TV Festival.

In addition to singling out Sir Robbie Gibb – the No10 communicat­ions director turned BBC Board member – as a “Tory party agent”, Maitlis claimed that the BBC’S “myopic style of journalism” achieved only “a superficia­l balance” while “obscuring a deeper truth”. But the BBC’S new Sunday morning presenter is adamant that there is no nefarious character pulling the strings behind the scenes.

“I’ve never been told what to say – or what not to say, maybe more importantl­y,” said Kuenssberg.

David Dimbleby agrees with Kuenssberg. Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today

programme, the former Question Time

host, 83, also dismissed the suggestion there is a “cabal” of Conservati­ve supporters in the governorsh­ip of the BBC.

Maitlis last week accused the BBC of caving to Government pressure after she was rebuked for a controvers­ial Newsnight monologue about Dominic Cummings breaking lockdown rules.

She claimed the corporatio­n “sought to pacify” No10 by issuing a swift apology for the segment, which received more than 20,000 complaints.

Maitlis is not alone in questionin­g the BBC’S commitment to impartiali­ty.

Kuenssberg will be replacing Andrew Marr, who said on quitting that he was “keen to get my own voice back”.

But these dissenting voices are beginning to be drowned out by journalist­s who appear to agree with Kuenssberg’s descriptio­n of the corporatio­n as “the trusted friend” among a growing crowd of news outlets.

Dimbleby said at the weekend that Maitlis’s mistake was to deliver her Newsnight monologue as a “polemic”.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4, he said, “The things she said I think should have been questions not statements.”

In response to Maitlis’s opening line from the controvers­ial May 2020 Newsnight segment – ‘The country can see that Cummings broke the rule, it is shocked the Government cannot’ – Dimbleby said “Well, not everybody may have been shocked.”

“It was a polemic. I think that was the mistake,” he concluded.

 ?? ?? Laura Kuenssberg, right, and Emily Maitlis
Laura Kuenssberg, right, and Emily Maitlis

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom