The Daily Telegraph

Shappsy dances merrily in the red mist of Labour’s impotent ambiguity

- By Tim Stanley

Grant Shapps deserves a bonus. He worked overtime at the Despatch Box to defend the Government’s anti-strike Bill, which, in his smooth selling, has morphed from forcing unions to guarantee minimum levels of “service” to “safety” (clever). They’re all out this week: ambulances, buses, teachers. The only people not on strike are the Royal family, which surprises me because their conditions are terrible.

The Labour back benches were packed. I’ve not seen so many socialist MPS in one place since they threw a picket at Jurassic Park. “One minute yer clappin’ key workers,” said Ian Lavery, “the next minute yer sacking key workers”, which was funny the first time one heard it but Lefty members repeated it again and again – perhaps, said Shappsy, because their questions were pre-written for them by trade union officials (if he’s implying illiteracy, the crisis is not defined by class. Harry’s book has been released in 16 languages, and he can’t read it in any of them).

Do they not know, said the minister, that France and Spain already enforce minimal “safety” levels? Well, well, well, said Labour’s Sam Tarry, I did not realise that this “rancid government” was copying “Franco’s Spain” or “Vichy France”. It says something about the Left’s antiquaria­nism that they still think Europe inhabits the 1930s, but implicit in all these far-left attacks on the Tories was a swipe at the current Labour leadership. Sir Keir Starmer says the unions have a point but won’t endorse the strikes. Mr Tarry was sacked from the shadow front bench for joining a picket.

New, New Labour is against everything and for nothing. Its next manifesto will consist of photos of Sir Keir having frank conversati­ons with kittens.

In the midst of this impotent ambiguity, Shappsy had great fun, complainin­g that he seemed to be “living rent free in Mick Lynch’s head” – and when Jeremy Corbyn rose from his tar pit to demand that the Tories consider the “stress levels of workers … who’ve had 10 years of frozen pay”, Grant replied that, first, not all pay has been frozen and, second, “what about the stress levels of people who can’t get to work?” Or “what about the stress levels of people who might be waiting for an ambulance?”

Richard Drax pointed out that when the Army was called in to replace strikers at airports, the service worked embarrassi­ngly well. Given how much soldiers are now expected to do in the absence of civilian workers, I’m tempted to ring the local barracks to ask if they could take down the scaffoldin­g the builders put up on my house six months ago.

But the best question was asked by Labour’s Rachael Maskell, who noted that hospitals were dangerousl­y understaff­ed before the strikes. So why aren’t the Tories obliged to provide a minimum service?

Alas, government­s have the sweetest contract of all: you can only sack ’em once every five years.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom