The Daily Telegraph

Fifty years on from My Secret Garden, do we still dare to be transgress­ive?

- jemima lewis

Good luck – and I mean this sincerely – to the actress Gillian Anderson, who is about to attempt a sequel to one of the greatest books ever written. Not great in the literary sense. Not academical­ly or scientific­ally distinguis­hed, either. And yet My Secret Garden – a collection of female sexual fantasies, compiled by the late journalist Nancy Friday and first published exactly half a century ago – belongs to that shallow pile of books that can truly be said to have changed our understand­ing of human nature.

In 1973, shortly before My Secret Garden came out, Cosmopolit­an ran an article declaring: “Women do not have sexual fantasies, period. Men do.” Despite secondwave feminism and the invention of the pill, the idea that women might have erotic feelings of their own – not just decorous responses to male desire – seemed barely plausible. Not least because women themselves never talked about it.

And then Friday came along with her collection of stunningly frank confession­s (she had put out a newspaper advert for contributi­ons, promising anonymity), and cleaved open a hidden universe. The chapter headings alone are so outrageous they seem, to modern ears, to cry out for a trigger warning: “Insatiabil­ity”, “Rape”, “The Zoo”. There was, it turned out, no limit to the transgress­iveness of the female imaginatio­n.

This was Friday’s gift to women: showing us that we weren’t alone in being weird. That, in fact, weird was normal. No matter how freaky your own fantasy, someone somewhere had thought of something worse. The testimonie­s were often clumsily written, apologetic or anxious (“Do you suppose this is all due to lesbian tendencies?”) but this only increased the feeling of sisterly recognitio­n.

Throughout the book, Friday reassured her audience that fantasies, like dreams, are concoction­s of the subconscio­us, and therefore entirely out of our control. No guilt should be attached to them, and no conclusion­s drawn from them. The imaginatio­n is a vast expanse to be roamed freely, and whatever you find there need not define you.

She did, however, believe that sexual fantasies were shaped by the mores of the time. Rape, for example, was a recurrent theme – not, she argued, because that’s what women secretly want but because they felt so ashamed of wanting sex at all. The “he made me do it” fantasy was a way of escaping centuries of female guilt. “Ideas like these, so deeply rooted in the mind no matter what the body does, will take another generation to outgrow.”

Whether subsequent generation­s have indeed outgrown them, we will see. Gillian Anderson – who had the idea of reprising Friday’s book after playing a sex therapist in the Netflix show Sex Education – has put out a request for submission­s from “all of you who identify as women: queer, heterosexu­al and bisexual, non-binary, transgende­r, polyamorou­s – all of you, old and young”.

It will be fascinatin­g to see what the virtual mailbag turns up. The tone, surely, will be quite different: no longer that mix of naivety, shame, excitement and relief that characteri­sed the first book and made it such a moving portrait of the female condition. Will the sexual sophistica­tion of younger generation­s result in even wilder fantasies? Or might they feel less comfortabl­e in the wild spaces of the imaginatio­n than the women of the Seventies did? Now that sexuality has become so wrapped up in identity politics, will they dare to be truly transgress­ive?

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom