The Daily Telegraph

We must slow down Treasury’s race to give away control

- By Priti Patel Priti Patel is MP for Witham and a former Conservati­ve home secretary

Margaret Thatcher once remarked that we had not rolled back the frontiers of the state in Britain only to see them re-imposed by Brussels.

Her impatience with our nation ceding power to the European Union came to be shared by a majority of voters. Brexit was the result, overseen by this Parliament, with Conservati­ve MPS making a promise to ensure the UK would “take back control.”

How ironic, then, that the Treasury has been hard at work on a plan to re-surrender control. Only this time, they want to race ahead and cede power to an initiative emanating from the Organisati­on for Economic Cooperatio­n and Developmen­t (OECD), a 38-member Paris-based organisati­on with far longer tentacles than the EU.

For years, the OECD has worked on plans for an internatio­nal minimum rate of corporatio­n tax, arguing such a measure would prevent a supposed “race to the bottom” among countries trying to encourage investment.

Fifteen months ago, the OECD succeeded. Britain was among the 135 countries signing up for a world minimum corporatio­n tax of 15 per cent for large multinatio­nals – even though the OECD was silent as to how this scheme would be policed and enforced. What happens if a country like China “games” the system?

In spite of the OECD’S failure to answer key questions about how its new 15 per cent worldwide minimum corporatio­n tax will operate, the 2021 agreement rang few alarm bells.

Many took the view that the measure was of little significan­ce, given our corporatio­n tax stands at 19 per cent, due to increase to 25 per cent this year. But now the penny is dropping as more people study such detail as is available. The deal this Treasury has signed up to will constrain future government­s, just as surely as ceding power to the EU used to constrain British sovereignt­y before Brexit.

We are now on a slippery slope to losing control over our taxation policies. Our economic freedoms are once again at risk and our Conservati­ve mission to transform Britain into a global beacon for free enterprise faces a new challenge.

One facet being raised among Parliament­ary colleagues on the Conservati­ve benches is the fact the OECD regime demands an “effective” minimum tax rate of 15 per cent on larger firms trading across borders. That means any country which sets corporatio­n tax at the new 15 per cent minimum will have to restrict tax incentives for big companies. Imagine that in future a reforming British government cuts corporate taxes to the new agreed minimum of 15 per cent to get the economy moving.

That government would then find it has to limit – or even kiss goodbye to – clever investment-boosting British initiative­s such as Investment Zones, the “patent box” and the superdeduc­tion for capital investment.

Our flagship policies to establish freeports and enterprise zones to create jobs, growth and attract investment also face being constraine­d by this agreement.

These initiative­s are crucial to any attempt at levelling up Britain. The Adam Smith Institute warned last week the OECD minimum tax threatens that ambition – the respected free market think tank titled its report on the matter “Levelling Down”.

Many of my Conservati­ve colleagues have similar concerns. They are coming to suspect the Treasury has been working to a simple but effective plan: smother debate about the new minimum tax, then get it smuggled through the Commons.

How does that work? Firstly, by failing to be fully transparen­t. Where is the impact assessment? What work has been done on compliance costs?

Secondly, the Treasury has admitted it plans to put the minimum tax measure into the Finance Bill after the March Budget. That means backing the budget as a whole or rejecting it and landing the Government in crisis.

In the Commons, those now turning their attention to all this are beginning to bridle. All the more so as we hear the news from abroad.

An EU directive will implement the OECD minimum tax – but give an opt-out to states that don’t have very many large multinatio­nals. This diverges from the OECD agreement, yet the OECD and everyone else in power buries their heads in the sand.

The US has legislated for a minimum corporatio­n tax – but the details of the new US law differ widely from the OECD agreement. So widely, in fact, that tax accountant­s fear companies will end up being taxed twice by accident – and have their concerns again ignored by people overseeing this globalist initiative.

There is no justificat­ion as to why the Treasury wants this measure rushed through. Ministers claim it could raise £2billion a year for Britain, but there are no detailed workings shown, only naive assumption­s and opaque decision-making. We risk significan­t levels of capital flight if the Treasury gets its way.

The UK is more likely to see revenues from the measure amount to zero, as low-tax jurisdicti­ons jack up rates. It is time for those who care about sovereignt­y, our economic freedoms and economic health to wake up to this threat – and time for the Treasury to slow down, re-examine and start answering key questions.

Our economic freedoms are at risk and our mission to make Britain a global beacon faces a challenge

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom