‘Eye-watering’ cost of regulation has kept prices high, say grocers

SUPERMARKET chiefs have blamed ministers for contributing to a surge in food prices after they imposed “eyewatering” costs on the industry.

Senior directors from Britain’s biggest grocers told John Glen, chief secretary to the Treasury, that onerous regulation covering everything from recycling to border checks was making the weekly shop more expensive.

Supermarket executives suggested to the Treasury that food inflation was “past the peak” and prices would fall in the coming months, despite a warning from the Bank of England that rises would continue for the rest of 2023.

Bosses had been asked to explain rising prices in a virtual meeting after the Bank said the cost of a weekly shop was responsible for stubbornly high inflation.

Mr Glen asked the officials to discuss the drivers of food inflation and how to bring costs down amid accusations about profiteering in the industry.

However, grocery directors blamed government policies for hampering efforts to rein in prices, with one figure describing the extra costs as “eyewatering”. These policies include added border checks, Scotland’s new recycling schemes for bottles – and plans to introduce a similar programme for the rest of the UK – as well as new labelling rules for Northern Ireland.

From October “Not for EU” labels are being phased in on all meat and dairy products sold in Northern Ireland, as part of a deal agreed earlier this year by the Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister.

The Government has been criticised for being too slow to provide details over the programme.

Directors called on Whitehall to do more to improve labour shortages, such as by extending seasonal worker schemes, to help bring their costs lower.

They brushed off criticism that falls in the price of commodities such as wheat should already be reflected on the shelves, arguing that there was a lag.

It came as the Bank blamed the rising cost of food and other goods for “almost all” of the unexpectedly high inflation over the past few months.

The Bank believes food costs, which are already climbing at their fastest pace in 45 years, will keep rising for the rest of the year.

In its latest economic outlook, Threadneedle Street said: “Food price inflation is likely to fall back more slowly than previously expected. “The current near-term projection for food inflation in the UK does not include any reduction in the average level of food prices, only a slowing in the rate of inflation.” Andrew Bailey tried to reassure households that the peak in inflation had already passed, though he was unsure when the cost of a weekly shop would come down.

“Energy prices have fallen from their peaks, and that will now start to come through as lower inflation,” he said. “Food price inflation should ease too, though we can be less sure about the timing.” Despite soaring food costs, Mr Bailey said that he did not think supermarkets and other grocers were profiteering.

Speaking to the BBC, he said: “It actually doesn’t look like that’s going on.” Food and supermarkets chiefs have been growing increasingly frustrated at claims they are not pulling prices lower quickly enough, with the chief executive of Magnum and Marmite maker Unilever angrily rejecting the allegations earlier this month.

In a heated media call, Alan Jope said: “I know it’s an inconvenient truth, but we have not been profiteering in any way, shape, or form.” Sainsbury’s has also brushed off claims it was keeping prices higher than necessary.

The Treasury said it had “listened to the views of the sector and agreed that industry will continue to engage with senior government ministers on the matter”.

‘I know it’s an inconvenient truth, but we have not been profiteering in any way, shape or form’