BBC anchor claims age and sex discrimination
Martine Croxall, 55, was one of five women turned down for on-screen roles after having had to apply
‘It is not a good situation where you are paying people who are off air and we are trying to get it resolved as fast as possible’
MARTINE CROXALL, the BBC news anchor, is suing the corporation for age and sex discrimination after spending nearly a year off air.
The 55-year-old, who was taken off air after “gleefully” reacting to news Boris Johnson had pulled out of the Tory leadership race in 2022, last presented on BBC News in March last year.
Croxall and other colleagues were told to reapply for a small pool of chief presenter roles after it was announced that the corporation’s home and world news channels would be merged in April last year. She was one of five female presenters, all in their late 40s or 50s, who missed out. They were left without roles, although remained on full pay.
The others were Geeta Guru-murthy, Annita Mcveigh, Kasia Madera and Karin Giannone. Guru-murthy and Mcveigh recently returned to work after other vacancies opened up.
Croxall’s case is listed at a central London employment tribunal on May 1, where she is suing for age and sex discrimination and equal pay. It will be the highest-profile BBC tribunal since Samira Ahmed successfully sued the corporation over gender pay in 2020.
The presenters chosen for the coveted chief presenter roles were two men – Matthew Amroliwala and Christian Fraser – and three women: Yalda Hakim, 40, Maryam Moshiri, 46, and Lucy Hockings, 49. Hakim has since defected to Sky News.
When the merger was announced, 18 presenters were required to apply for the five roles. Some quit rather than face the “humiliating” process, including Joanna Gosling. According to Deadline, the five women who lost out challenged the BBC’S recruitment process via an internal complaints procedure, alleging that the broadcaster already had a preferred list of presenters in mind.
The BBC said the chief presenters were recruited “via a competitive interview process in accordance with BBC HR procedures”. Tim Davie, the BBC director-general, told a parliamentary select committee last month that the corporation was working towards a “fair resolution” for the women.
“It is not a good situation where you are paying people [who are off air] and we are trying to get it resolved as fast as possible. I recognise that it has been going on for some time,” he said.
Paul Royall, head of the BBC News channel, was asked at a recent Media Society event how paying the women to be “on the bench” represented value for money for licence fee payers.
He replied that for any business there is “a transition phase, a transition cost that has to be part of the wider project”.
The BBC declined to comment.