The Guardian

Childcare expansion plan may struggle to hit targets – watchdog

- Sally Weale Education correspond­ent

The rollout of the government’s childcare scheme to tens of thousands more families is facing “significan­t uncertaint­ies” and may struggle to meet its own targets, according to a damning report by Whitehall’s spending watchdog.

The National Audit Office revealed the Department for Education (DfE) itself assessed the likelihood of being able to deliver the funded childcare places it promised, for September 2024 and 2025, as “amber/red problemati­c”.

Even if the government managed to successful­ly navigate the multiple difficulti­es ahead, it was not clear if the policy would achieve its primary aim of getting more parents back into the labour force, the watchdog said.

The NAO report, described as “utterly damning” by the early years sector, paints a picture of a department working at speed to meet ambitious targets without vital input from the sector or pilot studies that would have helped with planning.

The DfE already provides some funding for three- and four-year-olds, alongside disadvanta­ged two-yearolds, but in March 2023 the chancellor announced what was described as the “largest ever expansion of childcare that England has ever seen”.

At the start of April the scheme was extended to include 15 hours a week for two-year-olds. In September it will extend to children over nine months, and from September 2025 children that age and above can access 30 hours a week, necessitat­ing an estimated 85,000 additional childcare places and 40,000 additional staff.

While the report acknowledg­ed the DfE was on track to meet its more modest target for April 2024, it warned that “later milestones will be more challengin­g” and said there remained “significan­t uncertaint­ies around whether the sector can implement the changes and be

snust d financiall­y ainable”. Only a third of local authoritie­s were confident they would have enough places for September, according to the NAO.

The report expressed concern there was no consultati­on with the early years sector due to Treasury constraint­s before the 2023 spring budget. As a result, “HM Treasury and DfE set dates without understand­ing local authoritie­s’ and providers’ capacity and capability to deliver an unpreceden­ted level of growth in the workforce and new places”.

Plans for a series of pilot studies in a number of local authoritie­s, which would have helped test feasibilit­y and establish evaluation baselines, were cancelled “due to affordabil­ity constraint­s”, the NAO said.

The report warned of the danger of “unintended consequenc­es”, highlighti­ng the risk to quality as large numbers of inexperien­ced staff are drafted into the early years workforce to meet demand, against a backdrop of higher staff-to-children ratios.

It also flagged concerns that the attainment gap between disadvanta­ged children and their wealthier peers, which has been widening in recent years, could grow further as a result of the expansion, with the lowest-income parents locked out of the scheme. The DfE considered rolling out the entitlemen­t to disadvanta­ged children to counteract this risk, but decided against this due to cost.

Neil Leitch, the chief executive of the Early Years Alliance, said: “This is an utterly damning report which lays bare the fundamenta­l flaws of the early years expansion plans, and the consequenc­es of a ‘headlines first, details later’ approach to policymaki­ng.

“From the cancellati­on of planned pilots to the decision to exclude disadvanta­ged children from the scheme, it’s clear from this report that this policy has been rushed and poorly thought-out from the very beginning. As a result, we are now in a situation where the sector has nowhere near enough places – or staff – to meet likely future demand, to the extent that even the government is warning that future stages of rollout are likely to be ‘problemati­c’.”

Gareth Davies, head of the NAO, said the government had “sensibly” staggered the rollout to reduce risks, but warned: “The next phase of the reforms will be significan­tly more challengin­g, with little contingenc­y and flexibilit­y in its ambitious timetable.”

The shadow education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, said: “This is yet more resounding evidence that the Conservati­ve government made a childcare pledge without a plan to deliver it – and yet again families will be paying the price of the Tories’ broken promises.”

The DfE said: “The NAO rightly acknowledg­es we have exceeded our target for the first phase of the rollout, with almost 200,000 two-year-olds already benefiting from government­funded places – supporting parents to balance their career and childcare. We have taken decisive steps to prepare the sector for the next phases, including increasing funding well above market rates, launching a workforce campaign and new apprentice­ship routes, as well as providing £100m of capital funding to help expand or refurbish facilities.”

 ?? PHOTOGRAPH: RAWPIXEL/GETTY IMAGES ?? The childcare plan has been criticised for taking a ‘headlines first, details later’ approach
PHOTOGRAPH: RAWPIXEL/GETTY IMAGES The childcare plan has been criticised for taking a ‘headlines first, details later’ approach

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom