The Herald

IFS places a question mark over SNP’s anti-austerity programme

- MICHAEL SETTLE

THE SNP has been accused of “anti-austerity posturing” after a leading independen­t think tank calculated the Nationalis­ts’ plans would see a longer period of belt-tightening for Scotland than the main UK parties’ plans.

Nicola Sturgeon dismissed the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) analysis as “full of assumption­s and speculatio­ns” and stressed the think tank had got “the SNP’s plans wrong”.

The row follows an earlier one when the think tank predicted that the so-called “black hole” in Scotland’s finances, should it achieve the Nationalis­t goal of full fiscal autonomy, would increase from £7.6 billion this year to almost £10bn by 2020.

In its latest report, the IFS criticised all the main parties, saying they had not set out “anything like full details” on plans to cut the deficit and, leaving voters “somewhere in the dark”. It noted how voters faced a “definite choice” between £90bn of extra borrowing under Labour or £30bn spending cuts under the Tories; the biggest difference in approach, it said, since the 1992 election.

On the SNP manifesto plans, it confirmed they would increase total public spending in real terms in each year of the next parliament. But the think tank warned simply freezing department­al spending over the course of the next parliament would “not be quite enough to deliver” the expenditur­e plans set out in the Nationalis­ts’ manifesto.

This would mean, it argued, the SNP would “need to cut ‘unprotecte­d’ department­al spending in real terms by 2.5 per cent (£6bn) over the four years from 2015/16 to 2019/20”.

At First Minister’s Questions at Holyrood Ms Sturgeon insisted the IFS had got her party’s plans wrong. “Firstly, it doesn’t credit for any increases in revenue from the tax rises we are proposing. Secondly, it gives no credit for the revenue we would increase from cracking down on tax avoidance.”

She added: “The fundamenta­l mis-assumption at the heart of the IFS report ... is this one: it assumes the SNP would cut borrowing by 2019/20 to 1.4 per cent of GDP; that’s not our plan. Our plan is for borrowing in that year to be 1.6 per cent of GDP.”

But Labour’s Margaret Curran, the Shadow Scottish Secretary, said: “For all the bombast and the bluster of the SNP it has now been conclusive­ly shown that their anti-austerity posturing is nothing more than a front. Their plans would extend austerity.”

Scottish Conservati­ve deputy leader Jackson Carlaw said the IFS had exposed “the lie that the SNP would somehow usher in this glorious era of wealth and prosperity” and Willie Rennie for the Scottish Lib Dems said it showed austerity would be dragged out for longer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom