The Herald

Sturgeon ignoring majority of Scots, say critics

- TOM GORDON POLITICAL EDITOR

NICOLA Sturgeon has been accused of putting her party’s cause ahead of the national interest, with Unionist parties reacting furiously to the prospect of another referendum.

Leading the charge, Scottish Conservati­ve leader Ruth Davidson claimed the First Minister was “utterly irresponsi­ble” and had ceased to act for the whole of Scotland.

She said: “Nicola Sturgeon promised the 2014 referendum would be ‘once in a generation’.

“She has ignored the majority in Scotland who do not want a referendum and has decided instead to double down on division and uncertaint­y.

“The First Minister’s proposal offers Scotland the worst of all worlds. Her timetable would force people to vote blind on the biggest political decision a country could face.

“This is utterly irresponsi­ble and has been taken by the First Minister purely for partisan political reasons.”

Ms Sturgeon later took to Twitter to deny the “vote blind” accusation, insisting voters would be able to make an informed choice between Brexit and independen­ce.

Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale said Scotland was divided enough by Brexit without another referendum.

She said: “The last thing we need is even more uncertaint­y and division. Scotland would be a better place if the First Minister stopped dividing the country and started actually governing the country.”

Green MSP Patrick Harvie said his MSPs would vote with the Nationalis­ts next week in Holyrood in favour of requesting referendum powers from Westminste­r.

He said: “Scotland’s votes and our voice have been ignored by a Tory Government at Westminste­r, which we did not vote for, and a feeble Labour opposition.

“The people of Scotland deserve a choice between hard Brexit Britain and putting our own future in our own hands.”

Scottish Liberal Democrats leader Willie Rennie accused Ms Sturgeon of using Brexit as a pretext for a vote that would not reverse Brexit.

He said: “The First Minister refused to state that Scotland would be a full EU member under her plan. The SNP have airbrushed membership of the EU from their independen­ce plans. That will let down all those who support the EU.”

However, there was division within the wider Yes movement.

Former MSP Colin Fox, who was on the board of the Yes Scotland campaign in 2014, said the EU was “not the issue to win Indyref2”.

He said: “Nicola Sturgeon is making Scotland’s EU membership the central and overarchin­g issue in the entire debate.

“That is a risky strategy. There is a danger it sidelines the real economic and social challenges facing millions of Scots. It is not a forgone conclusion that Indyref will be won.”

Scottish Ukip MEP David Coburn said a referendum between autumn 2018 and spring 2019 would be “utterly prepostero­us”.

Business leaders complained another independen­ce referendum would add to the uncertaint­y already being caused by Brexit.

However, there was no repeat of the outright hostility towards the independen­ce cause seen in 2014, when the CBI briefly registered as a No campaigner.

‘‘ The people deserve a choice between hard Brexit Britain and putting our own future in our own hands

Typical of the muted responses, Liz Cameron, chief executive of the Scottish Chambers of Commerce, urged the First Minister to continue engaging with the political process of Brexit.

She said: “Scotland has been through two referendum­s and two major elections over the past three years, and there is no doubt that this period of continual uncertaint­y has had a material impact upon businesses in Scotland.

“A further referendum on independen­ce would be no different, and the more that can be done to mitigate the duration of this uncertaint­y for business, the better.”

David Watt, executive director of the Institute of Directors in Scotland, said: “Not many in the Scottish business community wanted Brexit, and equally, few want a renewed independen­ce referendum.

“However, if the political will is to move forward with another vote, business will react appropriat­ely and continue to face up to the challenges that such political activity presents.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom