Debt-strapped Tory council may not meet its legal budgetary duties

A TROUBLED Conservative-led county council has held an extraordinary meeting amid concerns that it will no longer be able to pay for services for vulnerable children and adults and meet its legal budgetary duties.

Councillors at Northamptonshire County Council held the talks yesterday to discuss how to tackle the funding crisis, with the leader proposing services are cut back to a “core offer”.

Council leader Matthew Golby warned they face having to decide “what we can realistically provide and how we can help to create resilience in places where the Council can no longer step in”.

He said in a discussion paper published ahead of the meeting: “With so much already taken out of our budget and more still to save, the County Council now needs to articulate, in the form of a core offer, the realistic level of service we are likely to provide, not merely to meet our statutory duties but to meet real local need.”

Speaking during the EGM, Mr Golby said: “The emotive nature of the speakers came out and I try to respect their views.

“We have got to take our own responsibility... and we welcome criticism and challenge. We know that the quantum of the challenge financially is huge... but we are going to do everything within our powers to win back the confidence and trust of people from Northamptonshire to get this council back on track.”

He added: “This is a massive task we are being asked to look at this evening... but I welcome some constructive feedback and challenge from opposition members.

“We want everybody to go back and take responsibility... for the people of Northamptonshire.”

Mr Golby’s paper said the offer would “safeguard all children and young people” while ensuring a “robust safeguarding system to protect vulnerable adults”.

But during the meeting, the Council leader admitted the comments from the Ombudsman were “frankly embarrassing”.

Of the 57 Northamptonshire county councillors, only 43 were present at the meeting, a week before cabinet meets to further discuss the proposals.

Opposing Mr Golby’s views on how to manage the budget, Labour councillor Mick Scrimshaw also opposed the council’s propositions and said: “There’s not a cat in hell’s chance that this year’s budget will actually balance. We need to send a clear and strong message to the government - we cannot manage because of stupid local decisions... and this administration is to blame for that.

“We are at the vanguard of the austerity project.

“I think that is just an excuse by some to reduce the powers and size of local government, the real agenda is to cut and cut and cut so we can go cap-in-hand to government.”

In July, the council issued a second order to confine spending to “only the most essential services”.

This came amid fears that its budget shortfall could reach £70 million this year.