Disabled fear free personal care cash will be clawed back
DISABLED people have warned that £30 million allocated to bring in free personal care for under-65s could end up leaving them no better off or even in a worse position.
The Budget saw the money allocated to implement “Frank’s Law”, ending the disparity between those over 65 who receive free personal care and younger people with high care needs who must pay.
From next April, under-65s will also receive free personal care as a result of a campaign led by Amanda Kopel, widow of ex-dundee United player Frank Kopel, who died from early onset dementia.
But campaigners fear the Scottish Government’s move will backfire unless measures are put in place to prevent councils seizing on any additional income from those who benefit to pay for other care costs.
Campaigners say such care charging – which they dub the “care tax” – has soared as hard-up councils increasingly insist on payment for services such as help getting dressed or going out to the shops.
The Government’s own feasibility study said this was a risk, “potentially leaving the client with a smaller increase in available income than that intended by the policy”. But ministers are understood to believe this will only affect a minority of people.
Norma Curran, spokesman for Scotland Against the Care Tax, said that, while the sum involved had risen from an initial £11m to £30m, the announcement was still disappointing. “This policy will not meet the hopes of thousands of disabled people,” she said.
“Most will now find they are still paying exactly the same amount in charges for “social care” as they used to pay for “personal care and social care” combined”.
On average, disabled people under 65 receive larger support packages than older people, she said.
“This additional support will still be charged for and, as a result, most disabled people in this situation will see no benefit.”