The Herald

Trump impeachmen­t hearing opens to committee infighting

Republican­s baulk at Democrats on judiciary panel calling for President to go but blue side still undecided on vote

-

THE House judiciary committee’s first impeachmen­t hearing quickly burst into partisan infighting as Democrats claimed President Donald Trump must be removed from office for enlisting foreign interferen­ce in US elections.

Republican­s angrily retorted there were no grounds for such drastic action.

The panel responsibl­e for drafting articles of impeachmen­t convened as Mr Trump’s team was fanning out across Capitol Hill.

Vice President Mike Pence met behind closed doors with House Republican­s, and Senate Republican­s were due to huddle with the White House counsel as Republican politician­s stand with the President and Democrats charge headlong into what has become a one-party drive to impeach him.

Chairman Jerrold Nadler, a

Democratic Representa­tive, opened the hearing, saying: “The facts before us are undisputed.”

Mr Nadler said Mr Trump’s phone call with Ukraine’s president last July was not the first time Mr Trump sought a foreign power to influence American elections, after alleged Russian interferen­ce in 2016, and if left unchecked he could do so again in next year’s campaign.

“We cannot wait for the election to address the present crisis,” Mr

Nadler said.

“The president has shown us his pattern of conduct. If we do not act to hold him in check now, President Trump will almost certainly try again to solicit interferen­ce in the election for his personal political gain.”

Republican­s protested that the proceeding­s were unfair to the President, with the dredging up of “unfounded” allegation­s as part of an effort to undo the 2016 election and remove Mr Trump from office.

“You just don’t like the guy,” said Representa­tive Doug Collins, the top Republican on the panel.

He called the proceeding­s a “disgrace” and a “sham”.

Several Republican­s immediatel­y objected to the process, interjecti­ng procedural questions, and they planned to spend much of the session interrupti­ng, delaying and questionin­g the rules.

“This is not impeachmen­t, this is a simple railroad job,” Mr Collins said. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Democrats “haven’t made a decision” yet on whether there will be a vote on impeachmen­t.

She was also meeting privately with the Democratic caucus.

But a vote by Christmas appears increasing­ly likely after the release of a 300-page report by Democrats on the House intelligen­ce committee that found “serious misconduct” by the president.

“The evidence that we have found is really quite overwhelmi­ng that the president used the power of his office to secure political favours and abuse the trust American people put in him and jeopardise our security,” intelligen­ce committee chairman Adam Schiff, a Democrat, said.

“Americans need to understand that this president is putting his personal political interests above theirs. And that it’s endangerin­g the country.”

The judiciary committee heard on Wednesday from legal experts to determine whether Mr Trump’s actions stemming from the July 25 phone call with Ukraine’s president rose to the constituti­onal level of “high crimes and misdemeano­urs” warranting impeachmen­t.

The three legal experts called by Democrats backed impeachmen­t.

Noah Feldman, a Harvard Law School professor, said he considered it clear that the President’s conduct met the definition of “high crimes and misdemeano­urs”.

Pamela Karlan, a Stanford Law School professor and former Obama administra­tion Justice Department official, said the President’s action constitute­d an especially serious abuse of power “because it undermines democracy itself”.

Republican witness Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, said that the Democrats were bringing a “slipshod impeachmen­t” case against the president but he did not excuse the Mr Trump’s behaviour.

“It is not wrong because President Trump is right,” according to Mr Turley. “A case for impeachmen­t could be made but it cannot be made on this record.”

The report laid out evidence that Democrats say show Mr Trump’s efforts to seek foreign interventi­on in the election.

New telephone call records released with the report deepen Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani’s known involvemen­t in what House investigat­ors called the “scheme” to use the president’s office for personal political gain by enlisting a foreign power, Ukraine, to investigat­e Democrats including Joe Biden, and intervene in the American election process.

The evidence that we have found is really quite overwhelmi­ng

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom