The Herald

Now we must all hold the victors to account

-

NOW that the pantomime season is over (no, the other one), it is up to the press and the public to hold whoever is getting into government truly to account. All these promises, billions of pounds, thousands of police, doctors and nurses, tens of thousands of homes, millions or billions of trees, multiple “new” hospitals, oh and £350m a week that we don’t have to pay the EU.

Let’s just make sure that their false promises come back to haunt them. Steve Barnet, Gargunnock.

POSSIBLY one of the most unsavoury aspects of political discourse over the past 20 years or so has been the way the performanc­e of our public services, especially health and education, has been shamelessl­y exploited by opportunis­tic and hypocritic­al politician­s. Yet over the past few months, in the run-up to this very dark December election, this contagion has contaminat­ed debate with unsurpasse­d levels of toxicity.

Fair and constructi­ve criticism is of course an essential element in holding the government of the day to account, but what we have witnessed in recent months has reached new heights, or rather depths, of dishonesty and mendacity, as almost every leading opposition politician has feverishly attempted to outdo each other in levels of hysteria and humbug when attacking the Scottish Government’s record over policing, health and education and other services. If you believed a quarter of what is claimed by some of them, we would appear to have the worst public services not just in the UK but in the whole world.

Of course a cursory glance south of the Border immediatel­y exposes the hypocrisy of people speaking on behalf of the very parties responsibl­e for grim austerity and savage cuts which have had a devastatin­g effect on policing, health, social care and education across the UK, but you will certainly find in many areas of England and Wales what a real crisis looks like.

Likewise, a quick reminder of the record of recent or current Labour or Labour/tory local council administra­tions in Scotland should make many of them blush with shame, though it probably won’t. They seem to have forgotten, or would like us to forget, who was responsibl­e for burdening our councils with many billions of PFI / PPP debt and who was responsibl­e for squanderin­g millions on vanity projects or fighting equal pay for female council staff.

According to some, everything was perfect in a past age before Police Scotland was set up (no mistakes, no cover-ups, no bad appointmen­ts abuses of power or botched investigat­ions etc) and you could be forgiven for thinking that our hospitals rarely if ever experience­d long waiting lists, staff shortages, health risks, medical mistakes or tragic errors in the past. Yet this hasn’t stopped some unscrupulo­us opportunis­ts from exploiting almost every tragic death, especially of children, or health concern, especially in our new hospitals, with a nauseous display of sanctimoni­ous humbug.

Of course there are problems, failings and mistakes in all our services, but shrill wailing from the rooftops over every problem that arises only serves to hide the truth and distort the reality, often making it more difficult to rectify matters when they do go wrong, as they inevitably will.

John Hodgart, Ardossan.

MARY Thomas (Letters, December 10), in response to my letter of December 9, really should have paid attention. I have never said that I have been dissatisfi­ed with the service from the NHS, indeed, I had a minor operation at Stracathro and the service was absolutely wonderful. My point is that the SNP is happy through bad management to waste millions at taxpayer’s expense, for example, a new hospital lying empty and GP practices closing or being taken over by the NHS. The SNP regime’s abysmal mismanagem­ent of most aspects of Scottish life and the control it tries to exert over us has resulted in massive debt which Derek Mackay is totally incapable of controllin­g.

Ms Thomas, in common with other nationalis­t correspond­ents, irresponsi­bly and unbelievab­ly refuse to believe the truth that the SNP is incapable of managing Scotland prudently. They constantly refuse to accept statistics from bodies such as IFS, Pisa, the Scottish Police

Authority and more – even their own Andrew Wilson, in their misguided belief that once Nicola Sturgeon leads them to independen­ce they will have reached the promised land.

Douglas Cowe, Newmachar.

IRRESPECTI­VE of who won the General Election, we still have an SNP administra­tion in Holyrood. During the campaign, Nicola Sturgeon focused principall­y on the constituti­on; no change there then. Yet the everyday realities of Ms Sturgeon’s overlooked day job – managing Scotland’s hard-pressed public services – continue.

During the campaign for example, we learned that, in many areas, Scotland’s education system continues to drop down the world rankings under the SNP. Hospital waiting time targets are widely missed, to a shocking extent for cancer patients. The obesity inequality gap grows for Scottish children, our arts funding is deemed to be in need of a major overhaul and Calmac is suing the SNP administra­tion over a ferry routes dispute. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if Ms Sturgeon made an early new year’s resolution and decided to concentrat­e on the job we employ her to carry out, instead of relentless­ly indulging her UK break-up dreams?

Martin Redfern, Edinburgh EH10.

Letters to the Editor, which should not exceed 500 words, must include a full address (not for publicatio­n) and contact number for verificati­on. Email letters@theherald.co.uk, or post to Letters, The Herald, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow G2 3QB. We may edit submission­s.

THE recent article on your Environmen­t page by Martin Williams (“Fears waste system will not be ready for Scottish landfill ban”, The Herald, December 9) returns to the topic of our letter in August where we predicted correctly that the Scottish Government would put back the date of the ban’s implementa­tion to 2025 and advised against punitive tax measures in the interim which the Government appears to be going ahead with; whilst suggesting the Government shows strategic leadership and ensures Energy from Waste facilities are constructe­d in time and in the right place, which it is once again leaving to local authoritie­s even though some only require a very small proportion of the overall capacity of an average Scottish plant.

The Scottish Environmen­tal Services Associatio­n (Sesa) makes the correct point that the 2025 deadline will be breached unless plans are implemente­d now for new plant.

Cosla states that improvemen­ts in recycling and waste management will be impossible if local authoritie­s do not have funding. This is somewhat disingenuo­us given (as we stated in our earlier letter) local authoritie­s were given significan­t funding through the Strategic Waste Fund (from 2001) to put in place recycling schemes.

In fact the fund, which was originally to run from 2001 to 2020, was and remains the single “gamechange­r” in terms of household recycling across the local authority sector in Scotland. The fund – which was new money – eventually reached a pot of nearly £133 million per year. Approximat­ely half of this was spent annually on recycling schemes up to 2007/8.

The newly-elected government halted the ring-fencing of the funding, meaning councils no longer needed to spend it on recycling projects and, worse, divided up the remaining unspent half amongst the 32 local authoritie­s, so that the block grant included more or less an additional £133m per year for recycling services.

Finally, between 2008-11 the Government created the Zero Waste Fund (£80m) which was a further grant to all local authoritie­s to enhance their recycling services.

All of this funding was in addition to the block grant to councils which incorporat­es funding for waste and recycling collection­s and disposal.

Local authority finance managers will argue about whether or not the full amounts of the original Strategic Waste Fund could ever be identified in the block grant. What is unarguable is that local government was given significan­t additional funding for waste and recycling services but chose in many instances not to spend it on those services; and then to cut the frequency of services or start charging for them.

What is also unarguable is the fact that Government has had the opportunit­y to introduce policies which would both assist it in meeting its own targets and simultaneo­usly help local government finance.

It has still the opportunit­y with the introducti­on of extended producer responsibi­lity where the packaging industry and retailers could be required to pay for local authority recycling collection­s in full and for the policing of the system. This would help improve recycling rates and its quality and educate the public at the same time.

Had a long-term strategic view of waste been taken a decade and half or so ago when funds were plentiful the landscape of both recycling and of residual waste management would today have been significan­tly different.

Colin Clark, Inverness; John G Cunningham, Falkirk; Chris Ewing, Fife.

SINCE the SNP came to power in 2007 I have looked on in horror at the exponentia­l rise of waste incinerati­on, which is nothing less than the apotheosis of environmen­tal vandalism.

When the SNP took the helm, less than 150ktpa (kilotonnes per annum) of Scotland’s municipal waste was incinerate­d. That figure has now risen to 1.25 million ktpa; more than eight times higher. There are plans, some at an advanced

There will be a ban on biodegrada­ble municipal waste going to landfill from January 1, 2021.

stage, for a further 1.75 million ktpa capacity.

Most of what is burnt is plastic and paper. Burning one tonne of plastic emits three tonnes of co2 as each carbon atom combines with two heavy oxygen atoms. Burning a tonne of paper emits 1.5 tonnes of co2.

But that is only part of the story. Incinerati­on companies claim to be efficient because they recover energy. In fact waste incinerati­on recovers one-tenth of the energy used to make the products in our rubbish. The energy used to make one tonne of the products in our rubbish generates the tonnes of CO2.

Claims that waste incinerati­on is necessary to avoid European landfill fines are bogus. Such fines only apply to the biodegrada­ble portion of municipal waste, that is, kitchen scraps and garden waste. Obviously these can be easily segregated and dealt with by composting or anaerobic digestion.

The SNP talks about a “climate crisis”. Indeed. It is doing its best to create it.

Michael Gallagher, Coupar Angus.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom