Resumed Stormont talks remain ‘slow and frustrating’ due to Irish language

DAY two of resumed talks to restore powersharing at Stormont have been described as “slow and frustrating” as optimism that a deal can be reached in the next few days declines.

Political parties were continuing to work towards finding a way to bring the Stormont administration back into action yesterday, with a number of meetings between different parties and the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland Julian Smith and Irish Minister of Foreign Affairs Simon Coveney.

Sinn Fein’s deputy leader Michelle O’neill announced that “clearly” there would be an Irish Language Act in any deal to restore the Executive, one of the major sticking points in previous negotiations.

“What we need to see is a package of measures that allows public confidence to be generated again in our ability to deliver good politics,” Ms O’neill said.

“What success looks like to me is, yes, there will be an Irish Language Act and, yes, there will be a package of measures that looks at a range of issues.”

DUP leader Arlene Foster refused to be drawn on whether or not there would be a standalone Irish Language Act in any deal to restore the institutions.

“It appears that Michelle continues to reiterate her red lines. I would much prefer to look for common ground in relation to where we’re going for the Executive,” she said.

“I want a fair and balanced deal that respects everyone’s identity in Northern Ireland.”

Ms Foster added that “if we are able to get an Executive up and running again”, they are prioritising health, education, job creation and funding.

Finding consensus on legislative protections for Irish language speakers is key to unlocking the deadline.

Parties are also at odds on proposals to reform a contentious cross-community voting mechanism in the Assembly – the petition of concern.

Yesterday, members of Irish language group Conradh na Gaeilge were left disappointed after a scheduled meeting with Mr Smith was postponed with 10 minutes’ notice.

The group said they were “extremely disappointed” in Mr Smith’s decision to cancel and had offered to meet him in the next few days, but had not had a response.

There were also indications there was continued disagreement within the powersharing talks between the DUP and the four other main parties on the petition-ofconcern issue.

Ms O’neill said: “There’s been positive work done across four parties in the main around some of the issues around the petition of concern. We have common ground in four parties and I hope that at some stage the

DUP will come on to the same ground as the rest of us in terms of wanting to make this Assembly and Executive work.”

Kellie Armstrong, from the

Alliance Party, said: “Today has been a slow and frustrating day, but it’s still a day where we are still talking and still trying to come to an agreed conclusion.”