The Herald

Traffic, not ice, is the real problem for this bridge

- MARK SMITH

In 2017, on the day the Queensferr­y Crossing opened to the public, I paid a visit to the bridge’s HQ in Rosyth and spoke to the man in charge of the project, David Climie, and there was one thing he told me that really stuck in my mind. The technology on this bridge, he said, means it should never, ever have to close because of the weather.

We now know, obviously, that Mr Climie was wrong. On Monday, the crossing was closed after cars were hit by ice blowing off the support cables and as soon as it happened icicles started crashing down on the Scottish Government too. How could this happen? Why was the bridge failing? It later emerged the bridge had no ice-detecting sensors, which was something for people to think about in the 90 minutes it took to make the detour round the bridge.

The Tories were particular­ly loud in their criticism. Their leader Jackson Carlaw said the closure was a damning indictment of the Scottish Government, but considerin­g Mr Carlaw was convener of the group that decided on the design of the bridge, what he appeared to be doing was damningly indicting himself. Yes, the closure was frustratin­g – I’ve been stuck in detours round the Forth Bridge a few times and it’s hideous – but the criticism was over-the-top. It also missed what’s really wrong with the Queensferr­y Crossing.

For a start, we should remember the crossing was good value for money as a building project of its kind. The estimate of £3-4bn was brought down to £1.3bn thanks partly to the fact the old road bridge remains open for some traffic. The project was also delivered just 10 weeks late, which, according to Mr Climie, was like building an extension on your house and it being delayed by two hours.

The reason for the delay in finishing the project was, of course, the weather. And that’s the thing, isn’t it? We have lots of bad weather in Scotland and, all things considered, the Queensferr­y Crossing has done well in withstandi­ng it. The old road bridge was regularly closed due to high winds but the nifty new four-metre wind shields Mr Climie was so pleased about on Day One have done their job.

In retrospect of course, Mr Climie shouldn’t have boasted about the bridge never having to close due to the weather because it was always a risk. No matter how much you plan, a big building project in Scotland is going to come up against wind, and rain, and ice, and even the most passionate critic would surely concede that.

It must be pointed out, though, that the criticism was never about the weather – despite what we have all read on social media and elsewhere this week – but about delivering on promises to rectify a known problem.

However, all that is beside the point. What worries me more than the cost of the bridge or the ice falling from it is that nobody seems to be paying attention to what’s really going on at a deeper level. It was designed to help ease congestion and to make things easier for commuters, but in the 12 months to October 2019, one million extra journeys were made over the bridge compared with the same period the previous year – a rise of 3.9 per cent. It hasn’t eased congestion, it’s made it worse.

Some of this may be down to the weather (again). In the old days, the road bridge would occasional­ly be closed by wind, whereas that has never happened with the new bridge, therefore there will be more days when cars can get across, and consequent­ly an overall increase in car numbers.

However, most of the increase in traffic will be down to the old rule of transport that we’ve seen working over and over again: if you build more roads, bridges and motorways, more cars will fill them. Effectivel­y, someone who might have taken the train or bus will think “there’s a new bridge, traffic must be better, I’ll take the car” and it gets as bad as it ever was. In fact, it already has: at peak times, there is more traffic on the Queensferr­y Crossing than it can cope with.

However, instead of talking about problems like this, which are profound and existentia­l, we’re talking about temporary problems such as ice detectors, which can presumably be addressed. At some point, a minister – a very courageous minister – is going to have to say what is currently unsayable: we shouldn’t be opening bridges, roads and motorways, we should be closing them down and introducin­g new public transport instead.

Maybe that way, drivers will be forced to change. Maybe that way we’ll realise that road bridges, even spanking, shiny, unreliable new ones like the Queensferr­y Crossing, are not the answer.

We shouldn’t be opening bridges, roads and motorways, we should be closing them down

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom