What if Trump refuses to concede? There’s no law that requires it ....
WHEN a candidate loses a US presidential election, tradition holds the candidate promptly and publicly acknowledges defeat in a concession speech to help with the peaceful transition of power.
The speech is typically a gracious celebration of American democracy. The Chicago Tribune and Arizona Republic opinion columns have held up John Mccain’s concession to Barack Obama in 2008 as an example of the tradition done right.
“The American people have spoken, and they have spoken clearly,” Mccain said at the time. “A little while ago, I had the honour of calling Barack Obama to congratulate him on being elected the next president of the country that we both love.”
A concession speech isn’t part of US law or the Constitution – it’s a timehonoured voluntary gesture, author and liberal commentator Van Jones said in an October 2020 Ted Talk.
He is among those who have speculated about the details of what could happen if President Donald Trump – who has declined to commit on a peaceful transfer of power and is now facing a narrow path to re-election – refused to concede if he lost.
Without a concession, usually hidden parts of the election process – such as the inner workings of the Electoral College – could be ripped open and used to decide the election in an unprecedented way. It would mean a race could be headed for a result decided by the courts or by obscure parts of the law.
While many Americans are used to presidential election results and public concessions from the losing candidate occurring at roughly the same time, that doesn’t have to be the case.
“As a legal matter, a candidate unwilling to concede can contest the election into January,” according to a report by the Transition Integrity Project, a recent effort by researchers to study scenarios that would put the integrity of the 2020 election at risk.
The mechanisms for publicly projecting a presidential winner, officially counting the votes and formally electing a president are separate from a candidate conceding the race.
Not in modern history has a candidate refused to concede, although a nearly instant public speech hasn’t always been the way
The modern understanding of a public concession can be traced to 1896, when William Jennings Bryan sent opponent William Mckinley a cordial telegram.