The Herald

Mutant strains make staying at home vital

- HELEN MCARDLE

AWEEK ago I did not believe that politician­s at Holyrood or Westminste­r would seriously contemplat­e another Marchstyle, lengthy lockdown. But increasing alarm over not one, but two, highly contagious variant strains of the new coronaviru­s circulatin­g in the UK has changed that.

Now I find it difficult to imagine that we are facing anything else as we prepare to enter the new year.

If the experience of South Africa and south-east England is anything to go by, softer circuit-break restrictio­ns will not be enough.

We may even need something tougher than we had in March.

A briefing by scientists on the UK’S Nervtag (New and Emerging Respirator­y Virus Threats Advisory Group) noted that the UK variant “has demonstrat­ed exponentia­l growth during a period when national lockdown measures were in place”.

Containing the spread of this strain will require extremely high compliance with stay-at-home rules and self-isolation in particular – something which has been woeful in the UK until now.

In France, anyone leaving their homes during lockdown must complete attestatio­n (“declaratio­n”) forms stating their reasons for going out – for example, essential work, collecting children from schools, picking up medicines. Residents caught outside without a valid reason or straying further than the permitted kilometre (half a mile) from their property have been hit with €135

(£120) fines.

In Greece, citizens must text their name, address and reason for wishing to leave their house to a five-digit government number to request permission to go out.

This might seem anathema to life in the

UK, but can it be a coincidenc­e that in the past few days both Nicola Sturgeon (in relation to stay-at-home guidance) and UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock

(with reference to quarantini­ng if you have been to South Africa or in contact with anyone who has) have raised the prospect of legal enforcemen­ts for both?

We are in a perilous situation – undoubtedl­y the worst since the virus first arrived in the UK– and, while the prospect of mass vaccinatio­n gives us hope, we have a long way to go, at least until mid-2021, before substantia­l population coverage is likely to be achieved.

If these variants take hold as experts fear they could, we must think seriously about better practical and financial support to enable people to self-isolate, both in the form of quarantine hotels and making isolation payments either more generous for the low-paid or simply easier to access (in Taiwan citizens are automatica­lly paid a Us$33-a-day stipend, but face fines in ranging from $3,000$33,000 for violating it).

So, what do we know so far about these variants that have cancelled Christmas and look set to overshadow the new year?

The UK variant, known as VUI 202012/01 (as in the first “Variant Under Investigat­ion” in December 2020) is characteri­sed by a total of 29 mutations compared to the original Wuhan cluster – 17 of which appear to have occurred in at once. The leading theory for now – although investigat­ions are ongoing – is that the variant first evolved in

September in a patient, possibly in the Kent area, who was sick with the infection for a long time, maximising the opportunit­y for mutations.

These are naturally “copying errors” that occur at a molecular level as the virus replicates in its human hosts and spreads. Think of it like a 300-page book where every so often a couple of letters randomly switch places as new copies are rushed off the press.

Occasional­ly one of these mutations will confer a “selective advantage” – such as making a virus more transmissi­ble. As a general rule in virology, however, the more infectious a virus becomes the more its lethality dwindles.

For example, the original 2003 SARS killed around 11 per cent of people who caught it compared to the new SARSCOV-2 version, which has an estimated case-fatality rate somewhere in the region of 0.1-1% . But SARS also ran out of steam and no case has been detected anywhere in the world since 2004.

A virus’s only goal is to be passed on and multiply, which is better achieved by being highly contagious – but not overly deadly.

It remains to be seen, of course, whether this will turn out to be the case for the UK variant, which is estimated to be 70% more transmissi­ble and, as of mid-december, was accounting for about 60% of all new cases in London.

There has been a suggestion that the variant may be more infectious in children after Nervtag member Professor Neil Ferguson told journalist­s that the number of cases of the new variant detected in under-15s is “significan­tly higher” than other strains, but there is currently no published evidence to demonstrat­e that.

The South African mutation, dubbed 501.YV2, has been detected in two locations in Britain – in London and the north-west of England. It makes up about 90% of the new cases in South Africa, which is currently in the midst of its summer when the disease should have been easier to control.

On Wednesday, South Africa’s Health Minister Dr Zweli Mkhize warned that the “rate of spread is much faster than the first wave and we will surpass the peak of the first wave in the coming days”.

Worryingly for the UK, Dr Mkhize has suggested the disease could actually be more lethal in young people, saying that doctors “are seeing a larger proportion of younger patients with no co-morbiditie­s presenting with critical illness”.

However, it is also true that young people may be getting sick because many more of them are getting infected this time around, with students and teenagers blamed for super-spreading the virus with post-exam parties.

The South African variant has more mutations, three of which might affect vaccine efficacy, though this could be rectified if necessary.

In the meantime, standard measures – hand-washing, social distancing, and selfisolat­ion – remain our best defence against transmissi­on. But compliance will be more important than ever.

Just when there seemed to be light at the end of the tunnel, the UK’S battle with coronaviru­s faces its toughest foes so far, writes Health Correspond­ent Helen Mcardle

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom