The Herald

Why do so many people drop litter? Because they don’t respect Scotland

- MIRANDA MOORE

AS one of the army of people who have found joy in our wild waters this summer, I rolled up at 8am to be greeted with a misty morn and a scene that looked like an Athena poster: serene, with geese gliding across the reservoir and silver flashes of jumping fish, as the sun struggled to penetrate the blue-grey sky. Quite the leveller for the soul.

This was my second impression.

My first was a panorama punctuated with discarded cans, baby wipes, a barbecue, an inflatable donut ring, plastic bottles and crisp packets sporadical­ly peppering the pebble beach. My friend and I tidied them into a pile – might as well do something about it rather than be sour.

I’m under no illusion that this is just an issue in scenic spots. The areas worst affected by persistent littering are some of the most deprived urban neighbourh­oods.

And while there are bigger issues facing us – climate crisis, the rise of the far right, the dismantlin­g of democracy, feeding the world, and who rules whom – the issue of litter has a far wider impact than aesthetics alone, affecting wellbeing, sense of pride, feelings of safety, fear of crime, quality of life, and environmen­t.

England has experience­d a 500 per cent increase in litter since 1960, according to CPRE, the countrysid­e charity. Unfortunat­ely, the picture here’s not much better, with 15,000 tonnes, or 250 million items every year, equivalent to 475 items, dropped every minute.

In recognitio­n of this, Keep Scotland Beautiful launched its Ronseal-worthy entitled Time For a New Approach to Tackling Litter report in December 2020 – with the tagline Towards a Litter-ate Scotland (bet they were chuffed with that) – concluding a co-ordinated approach, with greater investment and profile, is urgently needed to tackle the complex prospect of a “looming litter emergency”.

The success of the 1971 Keep America Beautiful campaign, featuring a tearful native American, Iron Eyes Cody, was hailed as a major contributo­r to falling littering rates. I’m not sure what our equivalent could be – a kilted Sam Heughan surveying the mountainsc­ape and blinking back tears as he picks up a rusty can of Irn-bru and a Tunnock’s wrapper – but, as with so many things, it seems sensible to spend cash on awareness and prevention rather than picking up the resultant trash. Awareness is often cited as the first step in changing attitudes – the higher profile, the better.

Keep Scotland Beautiful does try with its campaigns promoting community litter picks, while Zero Waste Scotland has borrowed the beloved tones of Janey Godley as the voiceover for its summer campaign: “Bin yer litter or take it home. Ye’ve been telt.”

Our right to roam is one of our greatest national triumphs, covering land and inland waters.

Access to natural places is for everyone – a particular boon after lengthy restrictio­ns and lockdowns – and I’m all for people enjoying Scotland’s majestic beauty and getting their dose of nature therapy. But rights don’t come on their own. They come in a twin-pack, with responsibi­lities tucked in by their side – more a Twix than a Freddo.

Culturally, the West is rightly obsessed with individual rights. Yet discourse generally sticks within the parameters of rights, without considerin­g responsibi­lities and collective rights. How often are responsibi­lities mentioned when we laud our right to roam? Not very.

Acting responsibl­y is enshrined in the right to roam. Where the Land Reform (Scotland) Act sets out who may access outdoor land and waters, the Scottish Outdoor Access Code gives a few basic conditions.

Essentiall­y, take the Twix wrappers with you, don’t invite 1,000 people to a rave, don’t torture rodents or step on eggs, and limit the wild camping to two nights before it’s time to move on.

Litter is a symptom of a society that doesn’t respect itself and lacks aspiration – part of a broader avoidance of responsibi­lity in our modern culture, perhaps. It’s a behaviour rooted in family attitudes and parenting. Schools can do their bit raising awareness and promoting litter-picks but when attitudes are ingrained in the family it’s a greater challenge.

How do you instil respect? It’s a slow game, with no overnight successes, but a higher-profile approach is a start. Litter attracts more litter – the longer we tolerate it, the more embedded it becomes as a normal behaviour. Scientists say it must be stopped at source, with less disposable packaging. In the meantime, while the producers work out ways to reduce packaging and promote refill and recycle incentives, it is down to individual behaviour.

Investment and opportunit­ies injected into deprived areas are also highlighte­d, together with greater community involvemen­t.

In other European countries, access to nature is accompanie­d by a “leave no trace” culture. Evidence points to pro-social behaviour once people have had positive experience­s of nature. So we continue litter-picking, driving home the message, promoting pride in our country, and hopefully, over time, that filters through. There is also the point of getting past the idea of nature as separate from our neighbourh­oods – the wildlife trusts want the public to engage with nature on our doorsteps without having to drive anywhere.

“Scotland needs rubbish role models,” says Zero Waste Scotland – by which presumably they mean we need good role models on the subject of rubbish, not role models who are rubbish. Their campaign showcases beautiful countrysid­e rather than showing us the litter. It’s empowering rather than depressing, augmenting the solution, not the problem. I hope it’s enough to make a few of those who litter pause and reconsider their behaviour.

The US philosophe­r Elbert Hubbard said: “Responsibi­lity is the price of freedom.” Perhaps we need reminded of this fact. Creating a more respectful society will gradually clean up our litter scourge, but it will take time. We are Scotland, and we are beautiful.

Litter’s a symptom of a society that lacks aspiration. Part of a broader avoidance of responsibi­lity in modern culture

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom