Forget the stale old arguments, we can create a new Scotland

WE are now one year into Nicola Sturgeon’s third SNP Scottish Government and 15 years since the SNP won office at Holyrood. But now, the combined Calmac crisis and Ferguson Marine fiasco have pushed Sturgeon and the SNP Government further towards the rocks in the eyes of the public.

Indeed, barely a week goes by without a regressive development in society in Scotland at the behest of the Scottish Government being reported, whether that be the deplorable state of our devolved under-resourced health service, the missing of the Scottish Government’s own poverty reduction targets or the use of private companies instead of the public sector (eg consultancy on the National Care Service).

This regression deepens and reinforces the inequality and inequity that still scars society in Scotland, since – even despite or because of – the devolution settlement of 1999. It is clear that the Scottish Parliament is not proving to be the protective shield from the cold winds of economic change that many hoped it would be.

This amounts to a crisis of social democracy and, therefore, of social justice too. It is not an issue about the competence of the Scottish Government. It is about ideology.

The Scottish Parliament was premised on the core belief that state action could produce a more civil and decent society by intervening in the processes and outcomes of market capitalism. Fairness and equality were the watch words.

Yet in a process begun by preceding Labour-liberal Democrat coalition governments, each consecutive Scottish government has retreated from this core belief, increasingly succumbing to the ideology of neo-liberalism – essentially, the belief that the capitalist free market is the best means for organising society and aligning supply and demand.

The Snp-led Scottish Government is just the latest reincarnation of this. Boiled down to the essentials, it believes that a successful capitalist economy is necessary to provide the wealth – especially in the form of tax revenue – to provide for increased living standards and a welfare state. Woe betide anything that gets in the way of capitalism being allowed to enact this role – even if it means pain and sacrifices for the many and riches and influence for the few.

There is, of course, a mountain of evidence to show this is wrong and immoral but such is the hold of the neo-liberal ideology that our politicalmanagerial class deem there to be no alternative and are inured to any pleas to be “fairer” or “nicer”.

At the same time, barely a day goes by without some mention of Scotland’s continuing constitutional crisis. For example, the case for and against independence is endlessly debated and poured over.

Yet there is significant social stasis as, despite the loss of the September 18, 2014 referendum for the argument for independence, the issue has never gone away, especially as the SNP has continued to form the Scottish Government since then with its popular but as yet stillborn mandate to hold another referendum.

Political polarisation over independence versus enhanced devolution is – and has been – endless and will continue to be so for some time to come. Each political issue is viewed through the lens of being for or against independence.

In the meantime, what is obscured in particular is the nature of the prospectus of independence – it could be many and varied from the SNP’S neo-liberal version to a social democratic one or even a socialist option.

Independence in and of itself is a nefarious concept unless we start asking the very basic questions: independence from what and for who? By the same token, this polarisation also obscures what continued or enhanced devolution would look like, what is would be used to deliver and for whom.

This provides the analytical rationale for the publication of A New Scotland: Building an Equal, Fair and Sustainable Society.

Brought together by the left-of-centre thinktank, the Jimmy Reid Foundation, over 50 leading left voices from the worlds of academia and activism have produced a book of 25 chapters on pretty much all the essential components of the past, present and – crucially – future of society in Scotland.

Although they express their respective perspectives on independence and enhanced devolution, they do not let these get in the way of their diagnosis and prognosis of what can be done in the here and now with existing powers to set society in Scotland on a new course for manifest social, economic, environmental and political justice.

And while they do no lay out any detailed blueprints as such, they do, nonetheless, set out the principles and polices that are need to make society for the people in Scotland equal, fair and sustainable. They all want the good ship of Scotland to set sail on a new course within local seas and global oceans, concluding that the mainstream political parties are not the captains or crew to do this.

They do so from the positions of hard evidence, reasoned argument, careful critique and enlightened ambition. In this sense, the book is a comprehensive and wide-ranging manifesto.

The Scottish Government – as head of the Scottish state – is rightly the focus on most of their attentions, whether that be over health, housing, transport or education to name just a few areas. But many of the chapters also look at what can be achieved in the realm of civil society, like that of arts and culture and especially through community organisations, campaigns and unions.

Not only is there something for everyone who is on the left or looking to the left in this book, but together the chapters provide a comprehensive guide to the key questions of our age: what is wrong with society in Scotland and how can we put it right?

They show how our “good” ship Scotland can set sail on a new course and arrive at a destination of equality, fairness and sustainability.

Edited by Gregor Gall, A New Scotland: Building an Equal, Fair and Sustainable Society is published in association with Pluto Press on May 20, 2022, priced £14.99.

The Scottish Parliament is not proving to be the protective shield from the cold winds of economic change that many hoped