The Herald on Sunday

The Brexit clock is ticking, and Scotland must act sooner rather than later ...

COMMENT DR KIRSTY HUGHES DIRECTOR OF SCOTTISH CENTRE ON EUROPEAN RELATIONS

- Photograph: Christophe­r Furlong/Getty Images

ON FRIDAY, the 27 EU states issued tough guidelines for the Brexit talks. They want a deal on the UK’s budget liabilitie­s and EU before discussing for future EU-UK citizens’ rights the framework trade relations.

With “sufficient progress” on these issues – in the words of European Council president Donald Tusk – the EU will then discuss the broad goals of a free trade deal, probably from December this year. By autumn 2018, there may be an outline of that trade deal but little more.

Whether it’s on having a second EU referendum, challengin­g Theresa May’s Brexit approach, or holding a second Scottish independen­ce referendum, there is remarkable cross-party agreement to focus on autumn 2018.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, backed by the Scottish Greens, argues October 2018 could be the time for indyref2.

By then, Keir Starmer suggests Labour might actually vote against May’s Brexit deal if it doesn’t exactly mirror the single market’s benefits – even though the EU’s guidelines explicitly rule this out.

Meanwhile, the LibDems want a second referendum on the Brexit deal, with the alternativ­e to be staying in the EU – again in autumn 2018.

May, too, talks of an autumn 2018 deal – though she has yet to admit there won’t be a full trade deal then.

None of the parties is suggesting a second EU referendum now. The EU, and many Remainers, continue to see Brexit as an act of monumental folly – damaging to the EU’s 60-year history of promoting peace among its members and inevitably underminin­g UK trade and foreign direct investment.

We now know – from May’s Article 50 letter and the EU’s guidelines – that any future trade deal will not be as good as single market membership. There will be no special exemptions for cars or banks or any other sector.

The SNP is focused on a second independen­ce referendum, not a new EU vote – but even they are not arguing for such a vote now, although it might allow a seamless transition into the EU.

May has also argued the Brexit deal must be done and dusted before a new independen­ce vote. UK voters can choose to leave the EU with no idea of the future UK-EU deal, but Scottish voters must wait, even once the outline deal is clear.

But what will we know by autumn 2018? We will know if there is an exit deal – principall­y encompassi­ng EU citizens’ rights and the UK’s Brexit bill. And we’ll know if the EU and UK are aiming at a broad, free-trade deal.

The details of services, trade, non-tariff barriers, customs procedures and more are unlikely to be known. A firststage deal on the Irish border may be clear, but will change depending on the final trade deal. So we will know a bit but perhaps not a lot.

We will know, too, if talks have broken down. If so, will the UK really head for the legal limbo, trade tariffs and economic crisis of the so-called WTO cliff? Will opposition parties call for an extension of talks and demand, belatedly, a second EU referendum, or an emergency applicatio­n for European Economic Area membership?

Amid the chaos of a talks breakdown, what would Nicola Sturgeon do – demand an immediate independen­ce referendum? Or wait to see if the crisis reverses Brexit for the UK as a whole? If talks go well, then by autumn 2018 the exit deal will be ratified. But serious trade talks could take another five10 years. Waiting for indyref2 until the future deal is clear could mean 202530. But will things really be clearer in 2025 or later?

There will be endless debate about the costs of Brexit – whether looking forward or looking back. By the mid2020s, many costs of Brexit will already have hit home. And a route for Scotland into the EU by the late 2020s could be slower and more difficult.

There are pluses on both sides for an early decision on independen­ce in the EU. A Yes vote would mean a more rapid route into the EU and would help avoid costly unwinding then reintroduc­ing of EU legislatio­n. Equally, if Scotland chooses to be part of a Brexit UK, an early decision means all political energy can focus on the terms of the trade deal and the critical constituti­onal and policy issues emerging from the Great Repeal Bill.

Whether a second independen­ce referendum is held by next year or not until 2030, there is no avoiding uncertaint­y, risk and debate about Brexit’s impact. The world will not stand still if Scotland waits 10 years. Costs of Brexit cannot be avoided, and the choices then will not be the same as now. Brexit is a huge and fateful choice by the UK.

Scotland needs to decide how to respond, sooner rather than later.

 ??  ?? Theresa May is talking of an autumn 2018 deal – though she has yet to admit there won’t be a full trade deal then
Theresa May is talking of an autumn 2018 deal – though she has yet to admit there won’t be a full trade deal then
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom