The Herald on Sunday

‘It’s baffling Scotland is no closer to this – it’s safe and could save our NHS a fortune’

- By Robert Donald

IT’S election time, so expect to hear candidates banging on about “prevention”, “value for money” and “evidence-based policymaki­ng” until the cows come home.

Sadly, one phrase that’s unlikely to follow – that delivers on all three – is “water fluoridati­on”.

As a dentist it’s baffling why Scotland still seems no closer to taking forward a policy that’s safe, effective and could save our NHS a fortune.

On safety, the science is clear cut, for anyone not wearing a tinfoil hat. Drinking water fluoridate­d to the optimal level is safe for all ages, be it toddlers, pregnant women or care home residents. It clearly reduces decay in children – and with it wholly preventabl­e pain and misery – and may also benefit adults.

And on cost, it’s the same story. Wonks have establishe­d that a £1 spent on water fluoridati­on in more deprived areas can secure £12.71 in savings after just five years.

Fewer fillings, fewer extraction­s: it’s simple maths. And it’s an argument that’s been won the world over, for the 370 million who currently benefit.

This isn’t some throwback policy from the 1950s.

In the last 15 years, an additional 50 million people have been covered, and if recent messages from Westminste­r are anything to go by England is now set to follow.

Covid means oral health inequality in Scotland – already a source of national shame – is set to skyrocket. And so we need to think about joining the queue when it comes to our water.

This gap between rich and poor is not inevitable, but millions of missed appointmen­ts, the suspension of public health programmes, and sugar-laden lockdown diets will only widen that divide.

Thirty per cent of P1 kids experience­d decay in 2018. So, if you’re looking for reasons why Scotland hasn’t moved forward with a tried-and-tested policy, then it lies in political wrangling that saw plans shelved back in the early 2000s.

One big positive emerged. Recognisin­g the necessity to get fluoride in contact with kids’ teeth, Childsmile was born – the pioneering programme of supervised brushing and fluoride varnish applicatio­n for young children that’s now been exported across the globe.

For Scotland today it’s not an either/or. Current disruption means action on water fluoridati­on would be a complement, not replacemen­t for Childsmile, and one that could benefit the dental health of all – from teenagers to their grandparen­ts.

But the political impasse is still with us. The Scottish Government’s 2018 Oral Health Improvemen­t Plan recognised that water fluoridati­on could make a real contributi­on to improving health, but at the same time argued the “practicali­ties of implementi­ng this means we have taken the view that alternativ­e solutions are more achievable”,

Yet the Scottish Government has never seriously attempted to look at delivery. Yes, there could be potential issues. No-one can pretend a programme in the Western Isles would look like one in the west of Scotland.

What’s missing is willingnes­s in Holyrood to look at what is actually achievable. That starts by funding feasibilit­y studies to show where the policy would work, factoring in both geography and patient need.

It’s not rocket science. As we emerge from Covid we can save millions and improve the oral health of all Scots. The question is are the next generation of MSPs willing to sign up?

Robert Donald is chair of the British Dental Associatio­n’s Scottish Council

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom